6sigmmaET

bighead · July 24, 2016, 23:41

anyone has experiences to share using 6sigmaET ?

pankajadgjmp · July 27, 2016, 02:22

would be happy to help

bighead · July 27, 2016, 04:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by pankajadgjmp

would be happy to help

thxs ... what had been your user experience ? particularly on the automated meshing and solver capability (particularly turbulence modeling). from the website, I think the meshing is good but lacks user intervention. Its just like an automated version of FLOTHERM.

pankajadgjmp · July 27, 2016, 05:37

yes it is indeed an automated version of flotherm. I had worked on it for an year. meshing and solving time of ET is comparatively fast as per my experience. you can drag and drop multiple components.

bighead · July 27, 2016, 08:57

what do you think about the level of user intervention on the mesh control and solver controls ?

dhivya.raveendran · August 29, 2016, 09:18

I have been working with this software for a year now for PCB thermal simulation. Has anyone faced an issue with too high grid count. How to then reduce the grid cell count and proceed with the solve.

hank0301 · April 14, 2017, 02:27

For ET, the grid number could be 10 million level and still easily solved.
At the beginning I also shocked by the huge number of grid, bit seems it is normal case if we run a PC system.
Now the un-structure mesh did reduce a lot unnecessary amounts.
If possible, I think it is worthy to try ET.

July 24, 2016, 23:41	6sigmmaET	#1
bighead New Member Melvin. Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 27 Rep Power: 17	anyone has experiences to share using 6sigmaET ?

July 27, 2016, 02:22	yes	#2
pankajadgjmp New Member pankaj sharma Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 10	would be happy to help

July 27, 2016, 05:37		#4
pankajadgjmp New Member pankaj sharma Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 10	yes it is indeed an automated version of flotherm. I had worked on it for an year. meshing and solving time of ET is comparatively fast as per my experience. you can drag and drop multiple components.

July 27, 2016, 08:57		#5
bighead New Member Melvin. Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 27 Rep Power: 17	what do you think about the level of user intervention on the mesh control and solver controls ?

August 29, 2016, 09:18		#6
dhivya.raveendran New Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0	I have been working with this software for a year now for PCB thermal simulation. Has anyone faced an issue with too high grid count. How to then reduce the grid cell count and proceed with the solve.

April 14, 2017, 02:27		#7
hank0301 New Member Hank Chung Join Date: Oct 2016 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 9	For ET, the grid number could be 10 million level and still easily solved. At the beginning I also shocked by the huge number of grid, bit seems it is normal case if we run a PC system. Now the un-structure mesh did reduce a lot unnecessary amounts. If possible, I think it is worthy to try ET.