Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 22, 2000, 22:36 What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #1 Ilkay Guest   Posts: n/a Hello all, I am wondering what are the differences between FEM and FVM. They are two different methods and FEM as far as I now, is good for structural problems and FVM is good for fluid flow problems. Is that true, if yes or no why? In addition what are the advantages of one to other in terms of solution. Thanking you in advance

 February 23, 2000, 00:59 Re: What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). In structure problems, the finite-element method is very popular. (2). In CFD, the finite-volume method is now very popular. (3). But the finite-element method has been used in CFD since 70's. (4). Most commercial CFD codes use finite-volume method. (5). Some commercial CFD codes use finite-element method. (6). You will have to run both codes on the same problem to find out the pros-and-cons of the methods. (7). There have been a few discussions and messages posted here before. Why not dig out thoese first?

 February 23, 2000, 20:42 Re: What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #4 clifford bradford Guest   Posts: n/a in truth their is no theoretical difference between the two and finite volume technique can be shown to be a special case of FEM. indeed you'll find that the terminology used is similar and the schemes are equivalent whether the flow is compressible or incompressible.

 February 24, 2000, 05:22 Re: What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #5 teelek Guest   Posts: n/a I am new comer in CFD field. How 's the finite volume technique can be shown to be a special case of FEM? Thank you.

 February 24, 2000, 13:20 Re: What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #6 clifford bradford Guest   Posts: n/a if you remember you FEM theory: if D(w,x,t)=0 is a differential equation for w(x,t) then the weak form of the PDE is 'integral over volume of v(x,t)*D(w,x,t) dV = 0' where v(x,t) are unrestricted weight functions. the FE method approximates the differential operator D(w,x,t) by substituting an approximation wn(x,t) = o(x)q(t) where o(x) are shape functions. the shape functions o(x) are restricted while v(x,t) are unrestricted. but we can trade reducing restrictions in o(x) for increasing restrictions on v(x,t). example the Galerkin formulation lets o(x) = v(x). in any case if the weight functions are appropriately selected the form is equivalent to the finite volume formulation. i don't know what choice of weight functions are required (i think they might be constants with x) because i haven't learned FE for fluids just structural dynamics. but the process is similar. the fact that the two methods are equivalent is useful because much of the mathematical knowledge base about finite elements (which is considerable) can then be applied to finite volumes

 February 24, 2000, 22:50 Re: What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #7 T.J. Wanat Guest   Posts: n/a I am no expert, but my understanding is that FEM is best used for structural problems and FVM is best for fluid and thermal problems. FEM was originally derived from physical principles using energy methods. Later, practitioners noticed that the derivations can also be made using the calculus of variations. They then used this as a springboard to solve other problems using the calculus of variations, including thermal and fluid problems. However, when solving these problems using FEM, the global conservation equations are not necessarily conserved. I personally find this to be a major drawback. I once solved a conduction problem and found that the total heat flux into the system was significantly different than the heat flux out of the system (it was more than round-off error could account for and there were no internal heat sources). I'll admit that it could have been a bug in the solver. The sum of external forces and reactions will always equal zero using FEM on a steady structural problem (within roundoff). I remember my professor proving it in a FEM class I once took, but I forget the reasoning. Similarly, the conservation equations will be satisfied over the entire domain when using FVM since the conservation equations are satisfied for each cell when the equations are derived. I believe this is one of the reasons why FVM has become the method of choice in CFD.

 February 26, 2000, 00:26 Re: What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #8 Marcio Aredes Martins Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Collegues In general both methods are efficient and robust, being capable to solve a wide class of partial differential equations. Several publications already reported some comparative studies among those methods. The general conclusions is always the same: both present a good acurate and robustness. An important subject is WHI do the GIGBOYS of CFD packages such as FLUENT adopted the FVM? In general the codes that use FVM are faster than those that use FEM. This is truth due to two reasons (1) in the FEM code it is necessary the numeric integration in the gauss points for all the mesh elements, what requests a considerable processing effort, (2) in the FVM code the discretized equation is implemented directly and, still, the system of equation to be solved presents fixed bands, being solved more quickly. Reminding that the "bottle neck" of the most numerical methods is usually the solver. A great deficiency that FVM presented was the mesh generation for complex geometries, however in the last decade, with the birth of MVF in triangular meshes, there is no more problem related with mesh generation. I take advantage of the opportunity to congratulate this discutition forum. Today my research subject is 3D FVM in tetraedral meshes for conjugated heat transmition and fluid flwo.

 April 3, 2000, 18:15 Re: What are the advantages and disadvatages of FEM/FVM #9 Phil Gresho Guest   Posts: n/a You'll find JUST such a comparison in my book, "INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW AND THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD" By P.M. Gresho and R.L.Sani, John Wiley & Sons, 1999; with a new paperback edition to be availabe in 1-2 months.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:13.