 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
April 5, 2000, 08:03
|
CFX/PHOENIX
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there anyone, who can tell us which of the CFD(CFX or PHOENIX) is better to simulate combustion? Thanks
|
|
|
||
|
April 5, 2000, 10:58
|
Re: CFX/PHOENIX
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What type of combustion (gas, oil, spray, coal ...) and what about the domain (simple, complex, moving cylinders )?
|
|
|
|
||
|
April 7, 2000, 12:30
|
Re: CFX/PHOENIX
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
PHOENIX CAN BE VERY GOOD FOR CAD OBJECT. DO NOT NEED A BFC GRID FOR MOST CASES.
Alain Ex DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER FOR LAIDLAW DREW LTD (COMBUSTION EQUIPMENT FOR GLASS AND STEEL INDUSTRY) |
|
|
|
||
|
April 20, 2000, 03:30
|
Re: CFX/PHOENIX
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think, CFX or TASCflow ist the better tool for combustion, because of that PHOENICS has some problems in following the development in CFD. Have a look at the programs.
|
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
