CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

local preconditioning

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 11, 2000, 16:47
Default local preconditioning
Manish Jaiman
Posts: n/a

Firstly, I would like mention that I am not much experienced with concept of preconditioning ...I would like to know how local preconditioning can be used to obtain time dependent solution using explicit methods.(concept of pseudo time). As far as my concern local preconditioning does not affect the steady state solution, nevertheless time dependent solutions accuracy is lost...Now i am again restating my questions that how can we get time accurate solution using local preconditioning....
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2000, 17:34
Default Re: local preconditioning
Bob Anderson
Posts: n/a
I am not sure I understand your question. Usually by "preconditioning" one means solving:

L*V*dw/dt = R(w)

rather than

V*dw/dt = R(w)

for the semidiscrete system. In this case you are NOT solving the original equations, except if your original equations are steady, when dw/dt = 0. So the short answer is you cannot do this "time accurately" because you are not solving the "right" equations.

However, you could implement something like this for example in a dual time stepping scheme, where an outer iteration is driven by a sequence of steady state calculations with a modified residual. See Jameson's work for details.

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2000, 18:08
Default Re: local preconditioning
clifford bradford
Posts: n/a
yeah when you use a dual time stepping scheme you can pull out the whole bag of tricks on the inner iterations (preconditioning, multigrid, local time stepping etc)
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 1, 2000, 08:31
Default Re: local preconditioning
Posts: n/a
There are always a lot of preconditioning techniques in the sence of dual-time stepping procedure both for incompressible and low-Mach number compressible flows. You can see the J. Comput. Physics for the last three years. It seems me, the most popular local preconditioning uses local (varying in space) pseudo-time step. This can accelerate convergence of sub-iterations, but time accuracy (in physical time) of converged (in pseudo-time) solution does not depend on such details. The problem is, that artificial-compressibility methods calculate numerical fluxes in compressible way, so that converged solution (one for steady problems or one for any physical time step for non-steady problems) does depend on artificial compressibility parameter etc. You can not do much with it.

With best regards
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 bookie56 OpenFOAM Installation 8 August 13, 2011 04:03
BlockMeshmergePatchPairs hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 07:36
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:56.