CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

thrust at pipe outlet

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 29, 1998, 10:01
Default thrust at pipe outlet
  #1
A.H.Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have a fluids application which uses a pressurised gas discharging to atmosphere from a pipe system. When calculating the force produced by the fluid, F=0.5 x K x density x area x (velocity)^2, books quote that 1 velocity head must be added to the system loss coefficient ,K, due to discharge into an infinite space. If a diffuser is used on the end of the pipe the system loss coefficient (for the diffuser discharging into an infinite space) is less than 1. This infers that a diffuser is more efficient at producing thrust for a given mass flow, is this correct?

(the gas is air at @1 psi above atmospheric, and V=77 m/s)
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 30, 1998, 04:32
Default Re: thrust at pipe outlet
  #2
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In the first case the force is F=m_dot*u [N]

m_dot is the mass flow per second [kg/s]

u is the velocity [m/s]

m_dot [kg/s] = u [m/s] * density [kg/m3] * Area [m2]

I'm not really sure of what you mean with a "diffuser" in the second case. If you mean that you let the air out through a divergent nozzle which is tuned so that it gives the same mass flow but has a larger exit area, then you will obtain less thrust. With a constant mass flow, m_dot, a larger discharge area will give you a smaller velocity, u, and thus a smaller thrust. The same formula as above also holds also for this case.

This is only valid if both devices discharge into open space so that you can assume the outlet pressure to be equal to the surrounding pressure. Another requirement is that it is subsonic flow. For supersonic flow a divergent nozzle would accelerate the flow and produce a larger thrust (that's why you see those divergent nozzles on rocket engines).

Hope I'm making sence and that I'm thinking correctly. Someone please correct me otherwise.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disturbed flow field at outlet boundary (Multiphase flow through pipe) Michiel CFX 17 April 21, 2010 10:14
steam flow in a pipe driven by a pressure gradient between inlet and outlet SalvoCalvo COMSOL 0 March 11, 2010 06:52
calculation of thrust thrugh a pipe with CD nozzle izhar Main CFD Forum 0 February 28, 2009 09:22
outlet boudary condition for a flow in the pipe Atit CFX 2 November 9, 2004 17:43
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:30.