# Backward Facing Step

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 28, 2000, 08:08 Backward Facing Step #1 Pete Guest   Posts: n/a I have a question about the backward facing step problem. At low Reynolds numbers (based on velocity upstream of step and step height), the reattachment length increases linearly with the Reynolds number. As the Re number gets larger, does the reattachment length stop increasing with further increases in Re? Does it approach a constant value for that particular geometry?

 June 28, 2000, 14:22 Re: Backward Facing Step #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). A good question, but I am not sure. (2). Within laminar assumption, I guess, this self similar behavior will continue. (3). For turbulent flow , it is around six step height.

 June 28, 2000, 17:45 Re: Backward Facing Step #3 Kalyan Guest   Posts: n/a With laminar assumption, I guess the length would increase with Re in a typical case. However, I am not too sure if the Re (as defined based on velocity and step height) is a relevant quantity at very high Re. The vortex shedding at the bend may be depend a lot on the step height. I do not think any self-similar behavior exists in this problems due to the singular behavior at the bend and the reattatchment point.

 June 28, 2000, 19:03 Re: Backward Facing Step #4 Jitendra Guest   Posts: n/a pete, It is true that at low reynolds no. if you increase Re reattachment length increases.At higher Re this reattachment length decreases ... interseting fact indeed. Have a look at landmark paper in Journal of Fluid mechanics. Vol 117. n1. Page 17-23. I forgot the author. good luck jitendra

 June 28, 2000, 19:12 Re: Backward Facing Step #5 Guus Jacobs Guest   Posts: n/a The following paper will probably answer most of your questions: B.F. Armaly, F. Durst, J.C.F. Pereira: "Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow", J.Fluid.Mech Vol.127,pp.473-496,1983 As you said for low Reynolds number the reattachement length will increase approximately linearly. For a Re number based on the maximum inlet velocity and the hydraulic diameter of the inlet section (in case the inlet section has a channel like configuration) that is between 1200 and 6600 the flow is in a transition region and the average reattachement length will decrease gradually to a constant average reattachement length of about 6 for turbulent flows. For other inlet sections (say a boundary layer) these numbers will probably differ a bit.

 June 28, 2000, 21:40 Re: Backward Facing Step #6 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). Yes, I was thinking about the steady state solution of the shear layer. (2). The structure of the recirculation region will be somewhat different. (3). For the transient flow solution, it is a completely different issue.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33 Fluids Main CFD Forum 7 December 4, 2012 12:28 bookie56 OpenFOAM Installation 8 August 13, 2011 04:03 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58 liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:07.