# help needed for b.c. treatment for cavity flow

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 3, 2000, 15:52 help needed for b.c. treatment for cavity flow #1 Yanhu Guo Guest   Posts: n/a Help needed for boundary condition treatment for cavity flow. The flow solver is for 2D compressible NS equations, while the Mach number is set to about 0.1. And do you think the results from this setting can be comparable with that from an imcompressible flow solution(same Re number)? Thanks in advance!

 July 3, 2000, 17:04 Re: help needed for b.c. treatment for cavity flow #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). It is a rather vague question. (2). Even within the framework of the incompressible solutions, the solution obtained depends on the formulation and the algorithm used, not to mention the effect of the Reynolds number. (3). Different algorithms will produce different solutions, as a strong function of the Reynolds number. (4). If the compressible flow formulation is transient, there is no guarantee that a steady state solution will be found. (5). Mach number=0.1 is within the incompressible flow regime. It simply says that the effect of density on the solution is small. (that is the compressibility effect)

 July 3, 2000, 23:45 more detail about the problem #3 Yanhu Guo Guest   Posts: n/a The thing is that I just found a case of incompressible cavity flow, the Re number is 400. (Shuen(1993, JCP) and Soh(1988, JCP)). I want to use it as a validation case for my code. In both of the previous simulation, the flowfield was steady after Time = 36. In my code, the velocity looks fine. However the pressure is decreasing along time marching steadily. For a incompressible flow, that is fine if the pressure gradient is right. However for a compressible flow code, this is a problem. I think the pressure should be prescribed at some point. However due to all boundaries are walls, the pressure can not be precribed. Thanks for your kindly help.

 July 4, 2000, 02:30 Re: more detail about the problem #4 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). At Re=400, the flow should be laminar and steady state. And this condition has been studied for a long time. (2). For the compressible flow approach, since it is a sealed system, the cavity must be initially pressurized. That is the pressure field specified , consistent with the initial temperature and the density. This is easy for stationary system, with a constant density, temperature and pressure. Then you can start the motion of the lid and solve the transient equation. (3). If the wall is adiabatic (insulated), the work done on the system will heat up the cavity through the moving lid. As a result, the temperature and the pressure will increase. It is a transient problem. (4). Or you can use the constant temperature wall condition. In this way, I think, it is possible to have a steady state solution. Anyway, the closed system is self-contained, the total mass is always constant.

 July 4, 2000, 09:08 Thanks #5 Yanhu Guo Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for your help!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post nadeemxs FLUENT 1 January 17, 2015 14:34 shadyenany FLUENT 9 September 15, 2011 17:01 jpo FLUENT 0 June 22, 2009 12:53 diaw Main CFD Forum 104 February 16, 2006 06:44 Tylor Xie Main CFD Forum 0 June 9, 1999 07:33

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37.