CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Question for discussion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 4, 2000, 15:12
Default Question for discussion
  #1
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When I was taking an interview in a university, I was asked the following question which is hard for me to answer, so I would like to receive your opinoin, thanks.

1)In your opinion, what are the major problems/difficulties of current turbulence models? 2)What do you think are the improvements and lines of research which should be pursued in turbulence modelling and turbulence in general?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 5, 2000, 00:11
Default Re: Question for discussion
  #2
K. Senthil kumar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
see my question on line Why turbulence models are not universal?hope it will clear all your doubts.if not feel free to post even personally.

senthil k
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 5, 2000, 09:25
Default Re: Question for discussion
  #3
Dr. Hrvoje Jasak
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Whoooaaa!! A good one. Well, let me try:

Extended application of turbulence models originally developed in the 70-s and 80-s reveals a piece of information crucial for future work: there is no silver bullet. The amount of research work in the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) has proven (conclusively, for me) that there will never be a RANS-type model which will be universal. However, I am also close to the conclusion that models available today are adequate for most engineering applications and fall into two main categories:

- 2-equation models, applicable to about 90 % of cases - RSTM models, for people who a-priori know that the phenomenon under consideration strongly depends on secondary flows.

Future improvements in RSTM modelling will be mainly associated with tuning and near-wall treatment; I expect no ground-breaking results.

The second area of research in the LES arena, where the foundations have been laid and it can be expected that this will be delivered to the industry in the next 5-10 years by a combination of increased computer power and better modelling. Open modelling questions (of my interest) are in the treatment of inlet and wall boundaries, as well as in the requirements on numerical algorithms posed by LES. Also, there is the issue of delaing with large amounts of data produced by LES runs in an efficient and meaningful way.

In the short term (because of limitations on computer power) we need work on the combined LES-RANS models, which will deliver improved results with only a relatively low increase in computational cost (~ a factor of 10). In the longer run, this work will be made obsolete through the increase in computer power.

From the industrial point of view, there is also a number of questions we need answered, dealing with the numerical issues of LES simulation: order of accuracy, locally refined meshes, as well as viable modelling (expected to be of wider applicability than RANS).

Comments, please!

Hrv
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
question about uds tanven FLUENT 2 July 5, 2015 11:22
Unanswered question niklas OpenFOAM 2 July 31, 2013 16:03
internal field question - PitzDaily Case atareen64 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 January 26, 2011 16:26
CHANNEL FLOW: a question and a request Carlos Main CFD Forum 4 August 23, 2002 05:55
question K.L.Huang CD-adapco 1 March 29, 2000 04:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:14.