CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Vortex flow fields & Nature

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 5, 2000, 13:51
Default Vortex flow fields & Nature
  #1
Oliver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi All

I need a prepectives on the following Dilemma.

Vortex flow fields in general are dominated by 2 velocity profiles.

1. Swirl Velocity profiles, are well established by a burger or even more simply by a rankine vortex

2. An axial velocity profile, which can either have a wave like or jet like velocity profile depending totally on the criticality of the flow. [Supercritical and Subcritical vortex flow]

My question now is as follows, Why inside the core of a vortex, does the axial velocity exceed or subceed that of the irrotational flow field, Why must it be so?.

Regards Oliver
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2000, 00:26
Default Re: Vortex flow fields & Nature
  #2
Vidyadhar Y. Mudkavi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i am confused by your question. could you clarify as to what you mean by axial velocity exceeding (or otherwise) the "irrotational flow field." do you mean why the axial velocity must exceed the swirl velocity?
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2000, 12:27
Default Re: Vortex flow fields & Nature
  #3
Oliver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Vidyadhar

In general across a vortex, the swirl velocity profile is in equilibrium with the radial pressure gradient and is well accounted for by Burgers Vortex.

In reality a vortex cannot exist without an axial velocity profile, it must be travelling through space. It travels say with a non-uniform axial velocity profile. Right at the center of the eye of the vortex, the axial velocity either exceeds that of the free stream axial velocity outside the vortex core.

My question is as follows; is it simply because there is a pressure minimum at the center of the vortex that the axial velocity exceeds that of the axial velocity outside the vortex core and why did nature intend on it to be so.

Any insight or perspective would be of great interest to me

Regards oliver
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2000, 00:25
Default Re: Vortex flow fields & Nature
  #4
Vidyadhar Y. Mudkavi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi,

if you take a burgers vortex or a rankine vortex, it is indeed possible for them to exist without any axial flow. it is also perfectly ok for them to sustain an axial velocity profile.

however, if you take a rankine vortex (or burgers) and allow the core size to vary along the axis, then continuity suggestst that there must be some axial velocity. often, the perturbation of the core can lead to enhancement of the axial component and a simultaneous decrease in the swirl component. this, of course, follows from simple physical reasoning. often this is related to the vortex bursting which is so visible in natural flows (particularly wing tip vortices in the context of aircraft wakes).

the presence of axial velocity, to begin with, has a lot to do with its generation. if you are talking about such vortices as the hurricane, tornado etc, they are created by natural forces. it is impossible to think of nature to choose a clean burger or rankine vortex without any axial component in it! experimentally achieving such vortical flows without any axial flow can be a daunting task.

i am not sure if i have clarified your doubt further. i do hope so, though.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2000, 17:47
Default Re: Vortex flow fields & Nature
  #5
Oliver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Vidyadhar

First of all thanks for the insight.

1.However a burger vortex is derived from the N.S equations and must always contain an axial velocity profile (uniform axial distribution).

2. A burger or rankine vortex can be produced by a rotating cylinder in a body of fluid and as such are artificial.

3. A vortex goes to great length to preserve the swirl velocity distribution (preferred case), such that there is a pressure minimum at the centre of the vortex, and as such the axial velocity is induced. Why is the case? Why does it not balance the axial velocity profile firstly, then think about the swirl velocity distribution?.

Regards Oliver
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can DES calculate the asymmetric vortex structure of separation flow? aladdincham Main CFD Forum 1 April 13, 2011 21:18
vortex shedding-perturb flow at beginning cfxuser1 CFX 7 April 16, 2009 08:21
Gas flow in vortex tube - LES and grid resolution bernarde Main CFD Forum 1 March 26, 2009 11:50
Question on 3D potential flow Adrin Gharakhani Main CFD Forum 13 June 21, 1999 05:18
computation about flow around a yawed cone Tylor Xie Main CFD Forum 0 June 9, 1999 07:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:31.