|
[Sponsors] |
November 14, 2000, 17:07 |
Chemical Jacobians
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am trying to implement a chemical solver in an implicit approximate factorization code. I need a chemical source term Jacobian. A derivation has been done for this in my group in the past, however the derivation assumed that the fluxes are written as such:
Q= [rho_1,rho_2,...,rho_n-1,rho,rho*u,...] where rho_1 is the density of species 1, etc. The code I am using now writes the fluxes in this way: Q= [rho_1,rho_2,...,rho_n,rho*u,...] Would anyone know how to "convert" -so to speak- the Jacobian for the first type of flux definition to a Jacobian for the second type of flux definition? Thanks very much in advance for your replies --Giovanni |
|
November 15, 2000, 14:53 |
Re: Chemical Jacobians
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Assuming Q1 is the old Q vector and Q2 is the new Q vector and W is the sorce term vector, you then already have d_W/d_Q1 and you want to compute d_W/d_Q2
d_W/d_Q2 = d_W/d_Q1 * d_Q1/d_Q2 you have to compute the transformation matrix d_Q1/d_Q2 and post multiply the existing jacobian with it. THat should be all. Regards, Srinivasan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
chemical reaction in stead of combustion | wlt_1985 | FLUENT | 3 | June 11, 2012 04:55 |
Chemical Scheme | SAKTI | Siemens | 0 | July 7, 2008 04:27 |
chemical reaction - decompostition | La S. Hyuck | CFX | 1 | May 23, 2001 00:07 |
chemical reaction - howto | Dan Sorensen | Siemens | 1 | February 21, 2000 09:20 |
Euler's flux jacobians | C.S.Venkatasubban | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 19, 1998 23:44 |