CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

How to determine y in low-reynolds-number models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 18, 2001, 18:13
Default How to determine y in low-reynolds-number models
  #1
Jeff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I am playing low-reynolds-number models on my cases. My question is this is a dimensionless number R(k)=f(y), where y is the distance from wall. My question is that y is for the whole domain or only for the viscous layer? For closed flow, how to determine y? I really appreciate your help.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2001, 20:19
Default Re: How to determine y in low-reynolds-number mode
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). It is a good question. (2). But you have to remember that all of these turbulence models are derived from the turbulent boundary layer flow over a simple flat plate or through a pipe. (3). By the time you are worrying about the exact definition of y or y+, you will be doing the turbulence modeling research. (4). You can sort of cover it up by converting the y or y+ dependency into other variables other than y itself. Then there is no guarantee that it will work properly either. Internal turbulent flow modeling is a very difficult field.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2001, 05:17
Default Re: How to determine y in low-reynolds-number mode
  #3
Peter Young
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For most lower Reynolds number turbulence model, you need to calculate turbulence Reynolds number based on distance from the wall for all cells. For Structured mesh, it is relatively easy because you normally know which wall a cell is attached to (for a channel flow having more than two walls, take the minimum distance).

For unstructured mesh, it's a bit more involved - you can store all wall boundary faces and for each cell calculate the distance from all walls, and then take the minimum distance.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2001, 06:49
Default Re: How to determine y in low-reynolds-number mode
  #4
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). I think, the turbulence model is always associated with the boundary layer on a wall. Therefore, it will have to be computed on the per wall basis. (2). In other words, each wall has its own boundary layer, and thus each wall will have its own y or y+. (3). This will be another "black art" in CFD. (4). The principle is very simple. If one take the classical viscous/inviscid interaction approach, we can compute the inviscid pressure and velocity field first. Then with the pressure field, one can use it as the boundary layer edge condition to compute each boundary layer flow on its wall. And it does make sense to do so from physical point of view. (5). I don't think that the boundary layer development is a function of the minimum distance to a wall. For simple external flow, it is probably all right to use such distance, because there is only one wall there. In that case, the normal to the wall distance measured from the wall is a good definition of y or y+. (6). In flows with more than one object or wall, such minimum distance approach can not take care of the physics of the flow. This has been an important issue for the advanced CFD users, and the development of the so-called distance independent turbulence modelling research is still out there. (7). The suggestion here is: one has to study the problem individually, and define the y or y+ for each boundary layer on each wall. (8). By the way, wall boundary layer is not the only type of boundary layer flow, jet or wake mixing layers are also boundary layer type.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2001, 14:18
Default Re: How to determine y in low-reynolds-number mode
  #5
Jeff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am not sure whether it is the best choice to select the minimum length from the wall. Since all the wall may have effect on the flow, especially lengths from more then one walls are of the same magnititude order. What may be lucky is that wall effect is significant in a small region within the viscous (sub)layer. Hopefully, determination of y far from the wall is in-significant. I am reading more references. I give my newest choice here for discussion. Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low reynolds number implementation jyothishkumar Main CFD Forum 0 August 5, 2011 11:12
low Re number k-epslon models Hossam FLUENT 1 July 13, 2008 05:00
Coupling of RNG k-e and Low Reynolds number k-e Amaranath FLUENT 0 January 16, 2008 08:08
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12
k-epsilon model, low Reynolds number formulation Märta-Karin CFX 1 September 15, 2003 21:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:38.