CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Free surface

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 22, 2001, 03:38
Default Free surface
  #1
hobbes2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For a convection problem with lets say a rectangular mesh, if there is a free surface at the top while insulated at the bottom, with the two sides kept at 1.0 and 0. What sort of vorticity and stream function plots can i expect? Can i expect something like many many little vortices throughout the mesh? Please advice.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2001, 09:53
Default Re: Free surface
  #2
Jim Park
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I assume that 0.0 and 1.0 are non-dimensional temperatures and the fluid properties are such that the Grashof number is in the laminar range.

If that's the case, I would 'expect' one major circulation cell, with the hot fluid (the 1.0 wall) rising, flowing across the top, and flowing down the 0.0 wall as it cools. I would not be surprised to see small vortices in the lower two corners, maybe several of decreasing size in each corner if your mesh is fine enough. I would not expect 'many little vortices.'

That's what I would expect. Don't actually know what I would get!
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2001, 22:48
Default Re: Free surface
  #3
hobbes2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your assumptions are correct. However what i am unsure of are my boundary conditions for temperature and vorticity. For the topsurface, being a free surface, vorticity is 0, but what are temperature?I am also assuming that the bottom surface temperature can remain insulated.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2001, 23:51
Default Re: Free surface
  #4
Zeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You can also take the temprature on free surface as insulating from envorimental gas. Because surface tension depends on temperature, the unbalanced surface tension should be coded if you want a better solution. The final temeperature distribution on free surface depends on your geometrical condition, Rayleigh number, and Marangoni number in you case.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2001, 03:14
Default Re: Free surface
  #5
hobbes2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Supposing if i leave my surface temperature at a certain temperature...lets say 0.5 (non dimensionless) while my left wall is at 1.0 and the right wall at 0. With the bottom remaining insulated, what sort of plots should i expect? Right now i am getting very weird plots. And i am not sure if it is my program being unstable due to the scheme i am using or the values of Rayleigh'snumber i am using or my conditions are simply just not correct. Please advice. Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2001, 04:31
Default Re: Free surface
  #6
Zeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1) Even if you want to ignore unbalanced free surface tension, treat free surface as adibatic and slip velocity boundary. I think adibatic temperature boundary condition is more reasonable than a fixed temperature boundary condition. (2) The temperature contour plot depends on Rayleigh and Marangoni numbers with a fixed geometrical condition and specified material (Prandtl number). (Only Rayleigh number if free surface tension is ignored). If you have set adibatic B.C. for top and bottom, for a very small Re, the temperature contour lines are almost parallelized, and it deviate parallel line with trend that temperature line on free surface is compressed to cold wall with increment of Ra.

Good luck

Zeng
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2001, 01:23
Default asking about Free surface
  #7
Budi Haryanto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello, I need help to solve Navier-Stokes Eq. using FEM-3D, to simulating of standing waves in a rectangular basin. Just a simple case. But I don,t know how it is. For Driven Cavity, it's easy. But there is no free surface in that case. Anybody could help me ? What kind of books I have to read, or papers, website etc. I don't need the source code anyway. Thank you.

me, student of Civil Eng. Gadjah Mada University -Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2001, 08:38
Default Re: asking about Free surface
  #8
levent
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

Perhaps you can try a method called "sigma transformation"

Regards Levent
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free surface is below than expected..results are not good mechovator CFX 24 April 8, 2011 00:41
Submarine Free Surface samwh CFX 7 August 30, 2009 07:14
Multiphase flow. Dispersed and free surface model Luis CFX 8 May 29, 2007 18:13
Equilibrium of a free surface under surface tensio Ryan Main CFD Forum 1 August 7, 2001 16:14
Modeling Free Surface Flows Elliot Schwartz Main CFD Forum 5 August 25, 1998 21:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54.