CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Level Set Method or VOF

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Kike
  • 1 Post By Bubba

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 20, 2001, 00:53
Default Level Set Method or VOF
  #1
Tareq Al-shaalan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello

Which is better method Level Set or VOF to study free surface flow.

I am studying two-phase flow with free surface. There is a vortex in the flow I am studying.

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 04:21
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #2
Kike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear colleague

The choice will strongly depend on the evolution you prevent for your interface. Each tracking method (Level Set or Heigh of Liquid, VOF, adaptative grids, surface and volume markers) has it own advantages and drawbacks.

Level Set Methods is easy to implement into any finite volume code and do not smear the interface (it has no numerical diffision), but it has serious problems when the interface (z=f(x,y)) becomes a multivalued function.

Volume tracking methods (VOF family) are widely used. It is itself a proof of its efficacy, but you will have some amount of numerical diffusion, deppending on how you reconstruct the interface after convection.

You have a wide spectrum to choose instead of this two. Nevertheless, between them I use VOF, with a special procedure to reconstruct the interface. I had applied this tracking method to liquid films instability and two-phase shear layers instability, with good results.

Try to find this paper (and its related referencces from authors):

"Direct Numerical Simulation of Free-Surface and Interfacial Flow.", Ruben Scardovelli and Stéphane Zaleski, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1999, 31:567-603.

I hope it helps you, good luck

Kike
Rui_27 likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 10:56
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #3
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

There is a group using combined VOF/Level Set method. I have not implemented this method, but, it seems like a good idea.

You can do a search on the Interest and will find some references.

P.Hsieh
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 13:10
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #4
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). It's going to be very slow for the reader, even if it can be done. (it has been tested one I guess?) (2). I normally do not wait for the banners to appear on the webpage, even for a small picture, it is taking a lot of time to load. (3). You have to consider the average users through average phone lines. (4). You can e-mail to someone to get the answer. But even in that case, most free e-mails have limited disk space to store the data. So, the picture can easily overload the busy e-mail box. (5). When you have problem with mesh generation, it is likely that you have problem with the algorithm used, not the final picture you generate. So, what is your problem?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 13:13
Default Err,answer to can I put picture in my post, sorry.
  #5
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 13:18
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #6
kalyan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I tried to keep up with the literature on front/surface tracking methods till a couple of years ago. What I have seen is that the VOF methods are better for 2-phase flows (for reasons pointed out by Kike) but most (atleast among the ones I have seen) of these methods use cartesian meshes. Front reconstruction could be highly problematic on curvilinear or unstructured meshes. Hence, I would suggest using level set methods on such meshes.

A free surface is just a front except that it is not purely convective (it has surface tension). Try to see which method gives you a good representation of the surface tension (geometric curvature).

It is hard to validate codes for free surface flows. Most studies I have come across are qualitative. (Eg. collision for liquid drops, drop impinging on a liquid surface/wall etc.). The most reasonable validation procedure seems to be a grid independence test. There may be known solutions using which one can validate a code but I do not know any.

Mixed level-set/VOF idea also sounds pretty appealing. I have not read the paper yet. If you try it, please let me know how it works.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2001, 01:05
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #7
Tareq Al-shaalan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello

I thank you all for your Response.

I am studying free surface in 3D flow. Is there any free subroutine for VOF that will reconstruct the free surface.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2001, 20:11
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #8
Glenn Price
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Doug Kothe, Bill Rider & their co-workers at Los Alamos have published a tremendous amount of material on the VOF method along with some comparisons to the level set method (see http://public.lanl.gov/mww/HomePage.html). Williams and Kothe have advanced the piecewise linear VOF method to handle unstructured meshes. See the above site for a PDF copy of a paper on this subject.

As mentioned by another poster, Stephane Zaleski & co-workers have also published some excellent papers on the VOF method.

The main drawback of the level set method is its inability to rigorous conserve mass. Recent works introduce global mass conservation constraints during the re-initialization procedure at each time step. However, this leads to local mass generation/loss in cells around the interface. Nevertheless, the level set method can accurate calculate geometric properties of the interface and is relatively easy to code in its basic form.

Not to exclude front tracking methods, see Prof Gretar Tryggvason's website (http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~gretar/) for the state-of-the-art on these methods.

Good luck.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2001, 19:33
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #9
Bubba
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I myself am developing a 3-d VOF code. First no there are no freely available 3-d VOF routines. I believe Sussman has an old Level-set code on his web page. I have no idea if it is 2-d or 3-d.

http://euclid.math.fsu.edu/~sussman/

Secondly, I have also been following the advancement of High Resolution methods

(publication from Peric).

http://www.nap.edu/books/0309065372/html/638.html

or the thesis of Ubbink...

http://monet.me.ic.ac.uk/publication...ts.html#Ubbink:1997

These methods diffuse the interface (2-3) cells however if that is the accuracy you are looking for then its the easiest method on ANY type of grid. In fact, in my opinion, if you combine this method with AMR and with a fast solver then you will be able to get solutions just as accurate as any other front tracking scheme...

This code is free and has all the goodies needed:

http://seesar.lbl.gov/CCSE/Software/index.html

Also one should not forget about phase-field methods. I also am intregued by the ghost fluid method of Fidqew (sp?). This seems like a very accurate method, although a bit more expensive.

Check out reports on Levelset and The ghost fluid method here:

http://www.math.ucla.edu/applied/cam/index.html

hmmm..it seems I talk too much

good luck..
JinBiao likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2001, 00:11
Default Re: Level Set Method or VOF
  #10
Tareq Al-shaalan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello

Can I use level set method for courser grids?
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Level Set Method - OpenFOAM-1.5-dev Ingenierias2003 OpenFOAM 2 August 7, 2012 04:36
Boundary layer in a pipe Clementhuon OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 6 March 12, 2012 13:41
Reinitialization for Level set method Amir Main CFD Forum 1 July 7, 2009 06:41
level set method with TVD scheme? zhanglei Main CFD Forum 1 April 25, 2000 14:01
FEM and VOF / Level Set Methods Christoph Lund Main CFD Forum 0 August 4, 1998 09:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39.