CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Finite differences

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 20, 2001, 13:39
Default Finite differences
  #1
Zdravko Stojanovic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is it possible to compute 2-D problems, only with fiite differences, no finite volumes? If yes, which classes of problems can be solved?

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 14:19
Default Re: Finite differences
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). You would normally learn how to use finite-difference method to solve fluid dynamics problems first. It is easier to understand based on the traditional calculus. (2). Finite-volume method is a control volume method, which controls only the global balance of mass, momentum and energy over the cell volume.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2001, 05:09
Default Re: Finite differences
  #3
Zdravko Stojanovic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have already been working with finite differences for some time. The reason that I am asking this is that I have been explicitly told that 2-D without control (finite) volumes, but only with finite differences, is impossible.

This is very important for me, because I have to estimate to what extent is this source reliable.

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2001, 06:31
Default Re: Finite differences
  #4
Petri Majander
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is quite possible to formulate 2-D problems with a finite volume (FV) formulation as well as 3-D problems. I'm afraid your source is not reliable on this issue ...

Petri M

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2001, 15:13
Default Re: Finite differences
  #5
Zdravko Stojanovic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks to Mr.Chien and Mr. Majander for their answers.

It seems that my question was not precise enough...

Is it possible to solve 2-D problems without CV and without FEM, ONLY with finite differences?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2001, 15:26
Default Re: Finite differences
  #6
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). Yes, finite-difference method can solve 2-D problems. You don't have to use CV or FEM to solve 2-D problems. (2). I have been using finite-difference method to solve 2-D problems. (3). I guess, some commercial CFD codes are written in 3-D form only, they don't have 2-D versions. So, in those cases, you have to model the 2-D problems in 3-D codes. (4). I hope that this is clear enough to answer your question?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2001, 21:55
Default Re: Finite differences
  #7
Kang, Seok Koo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why do you think FDM is not applicable to 2D problem?

You may know that many papers on numerical solution of 2D problems are based on FDM.

I think FDM, FVM and FEM have their own advantages and different ways of approximating PDEs.

First I recommend that you know the advantage and disadvantages of each method from books, and where/how they are used from papers.

FDM requires the use of a Cartesian or a structured curvilinear mesh, and directly approximates the differential operators appearing in equations. Body-fitted meshes have been widely used and are particularly well suited to the treatment of viscous flow because they readily allow the mesh to be compressed near the body surface.

In FVM, the discretisation is accomplished by dividing the domain of the flow into a large number of small subdomains, and applying conservation laws in the integral form. The use of integral form has the advantage that no assumptions of differentiability of the solution is implied, with the result that is remains a valid statement for a subdomain containing shock wave.

Whereas the FDM and FVM approximate the differential and integral operators, the FEM proceeds by inserting an approxiamte solution into the exact equations.

The FDM and FVM lead to essentially similar schemes on structured meshes.

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2001, 23:28
Default Re: Finite differences
  #8
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You've been talking to an ignorant person. Finite differences have been used to solve just about every type of CFD problem as have Finite volumes. There is not real advantage between them and on the basic level they are the same.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2001, 23:31
Default Re: Finite differences
  #9
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
you can solve any kind (dimension) of problem with any method. They are all basically the same. I'd recommend you read an introductory CFD book like the one b John Anderson.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Control Volume , Finite Volume, Finite Control Volume, Finite Element Method technocrat.prakash Main CFD Forum 1 April 24, 2010 19:24
Comparison: Finite Volume Method vs. Analytic Method m-fry Main CFD Forum 1 April 20, 2010 14:40
Finite volumes vs. finite elements: applications Lionel S. Main CFD Forum 10 January 22, 2007 11:51
Multigrid for finite differences Enda Bigarelli Main CFD Forum 4 November 6, 2001 13:04
U.F.D. :Finite Differences on Unstructure grids STROHM Main CFD Forum 4 August 6, 1998 15:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40.