# Is Mesh Accessary for Analysis

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 22, 2001, 04:30 Is Mesh Accessary for Analysis #1 Selina Tracy Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Scholars, My question may not make any sense to you cause it depends on geometry and flow. But I would like to know if there are any papers that indicate the difference in terms of the accuracy of results; hexa vs. tet meshes, if the number of nodes are the same. Selina

 March 22, 2001, 13:58 Re: Is Mesh Accessary for Analysis #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). The solution we are looking for in CFD is normally called the "mesh independent solution". (2). In other words, the solution obtained remains the same regardless of the meshes used. (3). So, you are free to use any kind of mesh arrangement or types, as long as you have the mesh independent solution. (4). For this reason, CFD is not for everybody. It is expensive, time consuming, and requires expert knowledge of the problem being solved. (5). If someone is placing the time limit on the CFD problem solving, he is likely going to get the wrong answer. And the rest of that is history. In other words, if someone is asking you for the CFD solution as soon as possible, he is saying that all he needs is a solution and he does not care whether it is right or wrong. In this case, you would put in fewer mesh points or cells, and cut down the number of iterations, and argue that the mesh used has the best quality, scheme selected has the higher order accuracy, and perhaps the algorithm is the advanced coupled method. (6). Anyway, if you change the mesh size and the solution also changes, then you don't have the mesh independent solution yet. The consequence of that can be nothing or another multi-million dollar failure.

 March 24, 2001, 23:23 Re: Is Mesh Accessary for Analysis #3 clifford bradford Guest   Posts: n/a You have to realise that it is dependent on the CFD scheme. some schemes are specially developed for arbtrary meshes while some require structured mesh also it's usually difficult to meet the requirement of number of nodes being the same for the same geometry between tets ahnd bricks. you may wirsh to peruse the Journal of Computational Physics though. you can also try any of the other big CFD type journals you'll have to look hard though.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post everest ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 44 April 14, 2016 06:41 Ladnam OpenFOAM 0 September 14, 2011 06:30 student123a ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 13 December 8, 2010 11:40 morteza08 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 July 26, 2010 01:10 arya CFX 4 June 19, 2007 12:21

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52.