CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Solution in Physical or Computational ???

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 30, 2001, 11:12
Default Solution in Physical or Computational ???
Mohammad Kermani
Posts: n/a
Hi dear friends,

There has always been a question between the fluid solvers?

Which one of the following approaches are more suitable to solve fluid equations?

1) To directly solve the fluid equations in physical domain by finite volume approach or

2) to transform the fluid equations into a generalized coordinates system (into a computational domain) and solve in this domain.

There are some very well know benefits of (1) as they are very flexible and can easily occupy the domain of compuation. Are there any good reference out there that discusses one against the other or can any one explain on this issue.


  Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2001, 14:49
Default Re: Solution in Physical or Computational ???
Selina Tracy
Posts: n/a
If I am correct, the latter case is using so-called bfc system. I learned cfd by (1) but more than 10 years I have been using (2) which is more general though less intuitive at first (but the results are usually expressed by u,v,w,p and scalars in Cartesian which we can easily understand). So, personally, I prefer (2) because it's been working well for numerous models with curved surfaces. In terms of accuracy of the results, I have no idea since there are so many factors changing the results.

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 31, 2001, 05:00
Default Re: Solution in Physical or Computational ???
Posts: n/a
Hi I have a question on the subject of your question in the following way: What is our final result by doing strictly CFD and beeing appart of the physics behind, do we go far from theoretical and most analytical discussions when we go into CFD codes and methods. As an example the case of dense gas dynamics and the usage of time coupled p-version least square finite element method on the governing equations (NS, Enskog,...)

God bless you Reza
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2001, 02:29
Default Re: Solution in Physical or Computational ???
John C. Chien
Posts: n/a
(1). If you have not studied the boundary layer theory, then it is time to do so. (2). The boundary layer theory book by Schlichting is a good reference and text book. (3). After you finished reading the book, let's know your conclusion.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
grid dependancy gueynard a. Main CFD Forum 19 June 27, 2014 21:22
Neumann Boundary Condition for Poisson Equation solution in Polar Coordinates prapanj Main CFD Forum 2 July 30, 2011 19:07
Transient, initial variables from a previous solution nakor FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 0 April 22, 2011 04:34
Doubt on Implicit Methods analyse In India Main CFD Forum 10 March 9, 2007 04:01
Wall functions Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 6 February 5, 1999 02:16

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:00.