CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Residual averaging/smoothing on unstructured grids

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 11, 2001, 18:06
Default Residual averaging/smoothing on unstructured grids
  #1
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does anyone have a list of references for residual averaging on unstructured meshes?
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2001, 12:56
Default Re: Residual averaging/smoothing on unstructured g
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). What is residual averaging?
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2001, 09:24
Default Re: Residual averaging/smoothing on unstructured g
  #3
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As you are probably aware Jameson implemented several convergence acceleration techniques for the NS/Euler equation. Residual averaging is a tehnique by which after calculating the residual (ie the space dependent terms in the equations) a smoothing operator similar to the laplacian is applied. the smooothed residual is then used for time stepping. This technique is useful in accelerating convergence for explicit schemes.

I was interested to know if there are any special approaches required for unstructured meshes.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2001, 11:30
Default Re: Residual averaging/smoothing on unstructured g
  #4
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). Sorry, I am not using Jameson's method. (2)."a smoothing operator similar to the laplacian is applied", how was this operator derived and how does it look like? I heard that he had developed many special techniques. (3).Was this technique originally developed for structured or unstructured meshes?
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2001, 13:49
Default Re: Residual averaging/smoothing on unstructured g
  #5
frank
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In some early papers of Mavriplis, this approach is described, which I implemented once too ...some time ago. It is not very difficult..just some jacobi iteration.

Should be a paper by Mavriplis/Jameson if I remember it correctly.

Residual smoothing is ok, but at the end I did not go for it since I use fully implicit schemes. If you do not have multigrid, explicit will be too slow anyhow and a factor of 2 or so, which you may push up the CFL number is not too exciting. Of course, if one can this factor by just a few additional smoothing operations, it is probably nice to implement. My experience is too low on it to evaluate it adequately !

If one implements boundary conditions by some kind of residual modification, one has to be somewhat careful when averaging the residuals and be sure that boundary conditions are still implemented correctly after smoothing. That is what I felt, when I did this.

I will look for the Mavriplis paper tomorrow or so and post it again.

Anyway, I would have a look at all the Mavriplis papers at ICASE, where he often describes this technique in context of multigrid agglomeration.

Frank
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence jonmec OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 28, 2011 05:24
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM 6 April 12, 2011 11:24
Differences between serial and parallel runs carsten OpenFOAM Bugs 11 September 12, 2008 11:16
Unknown error sivakumar OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 9 September 9, 2008 12:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25.