CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

P4 vs Alpha

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 6, 2001, 14:56
Default P4 vs Alpha
  #1
Peter Menegay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We do alot of turbomachinery CFD analysis, mainly for centrifugal compressors, using Tascflow and Star-CD. Mostly we use Dec Alpha's for this work and we are planning to get some new 833 MHz Alpha's in the near future. However, I have seen performance numbers for the newest PC's (P4 1.5 GHz) which seem to rival the Alpha performance even in numerically intense applications. I'm looking at the SpecCFP numbers here (www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/cfp2000.html). The PC's cost less than half what the Alpha's cost (single CPU), so if the performance numbers are true, we should really change over to PC's. Does anyone have any comments on PC performance vs. Alpha's (or other workstations) for CFD apps? Can anyone out there confirm or refute what I have said? Any comments, general or specific, would be appreciated.

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2001, 13:49
Default Re: P4 vs Alpha
  #2
Scott W.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've been researching this area for the last few weeks to determine which new computer to get. Here are my general thoughts. The Alpha manufacturer (and others) have focused much of their efforts on making one very fast processor. Intel and AMD have focused on mass producing processors. Years ago, comparing a single processor Intel with an Alpha system gave a very favorable price/performance ratio to the Alphas. However, now that Intel and AMD can mass produce the processors AND now that these can be made into multiple processor workstations and servers, the Alpha benefit has eroded. Compare the price/performance of an 8 processor P3 Xeon with any Alpha and you will see my point.

Intel won't say for sure, but the street estimate is that multi-processor P4's will be available in June/July 2001. Buy a computer then, I bet a dual processor P4 at 2.0 GHz will meet most peoples needs. As for AMD, the rumor has it that a multi-processor version might come out on May 15th.

Intel's is making a great effort for very inexpensive 4,000 processor servers. I hope that CFD codes will be written to make efficient use of this high number of processors. Who knows if Alpha machines will be able to catch up?
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
alphaEqn.H in twoPhaseEulerFoam cheng1988sjtu OpenFOAM Bugs 15 May 1, 2016 17:12
about bounded alpha equation for bubbleFoam and twoPhaseEulerFoam kaifu OpenFOAM 2 May 6, 2011 06:33
settlingFoam fails with timeVarying conditions on U alberto OpenFOAM Bugs 1 April 21, 2010 15:16
BubbleFoam alpha equation alberto OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 September 21, 2005 02:33
Determining alpha and beta for porous baffle Liaqat Khan Siemens 1 October 27, 2000 05:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53.