CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Compiler for Windows2000

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 1, 2001, 15:24
Default Compiler for Windows2000
  #1
Selina Tracy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Anybody knows the best compiler for BOTH C and Fortran77 on Windows 2000? The application is mainly for graphics. Thanks.

-Selina
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2001, 15:20
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #2
?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i'd say the best one is the free one
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2001, 05:51
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #3
Peter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You can get a free fortran77 compiler in Salford
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2001, 00:10
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #4
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). I am still writing programs in Window98. (2). I am using VC++, writing Window programs using MFC library and graphics. (3). The operation of VC++ is very efficient, because it actually write most of the program skelton for you. You just add portion of the program to the automatically created program. And that saves you a lot of time.(a lot) (4). The other choice is Visual Basic, it can handle the same thing easily, but the execution speed is slower than VC++.(but easier to program) (5). The 3-D graphics will be more complex, and you need to use OpenGL library or DirectX 3-D library.(from VC++ naturally) (6). So, I would say that VC++ is the standard language (or compiler) to use on MS Window systems. In other words, it is a all-in-one system.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2001, 08:27
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #5
Sebastien Perron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry John, but I must disagree with you on building your code with the application Wizard. At this moment, I am working on a code that was written by somebody else using the application wizard that come with VC++. This is a piece of crap. It causes me awfull headaches. It is realy hard to understand the parts that were written with the app wizard. VC++ and digital fortran are good compilers and they come witgh a nice IDE. But, if you intend to let other developers work on your code I suggest not using the application wizard (humans will always be smarter that computers....).
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2001, 12:52
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #6
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). I agree with you that the machine generated code is very hard to understand. (2). Actually, as a programmer of VC++, I have never tried to read the machine generated part of the code. (3). I only write my part of the code, and insert it in the space allocated for the programmer. You can't put your code anywhere. It must be placed only in the specific area. (4). So, don't try to read the VC++ code written by Application Wizard, unless you are already a MS MFC expert. A windows program is highly complex, and many tasks are hidden from the programmer. (5). There are several level of codes you can write using VC++, (a). Old style DOS (console) program with line command input, (b). Windows program without using MS MFC class library, (c). Windows program using MS MFC class library, (d). Windows program using MS MFC class library and Application Wizard, Class Wizard. (6). Windows program is not developed for others to read the source code, it is developed for a programmer to write a user-friendly code. (7). My suggestion is: if you are trying to write a code for others to read or modify, then simple DOS version is the way to go. (non-windows program)
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2001, 16:26
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #7
Sebastien Perron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Everything, you wrote was clever. But, it is possible to design a Windows program and use MFC functions for the API without the application wizard.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2001, 00:11
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #8
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). It is a hard way to learn MFC. (2). So, in reality, people use Application Wizard and Class Wizard. (3). It is the same reason why Visual Basic is so popular. You let the program to write code for you. (4). But to learn MFC, you will have to learn each class and its functions first.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2001, 19:17
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #9
Selina Tracy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks.

I agree. I have VC++, so all I have to do is buying a new Fortran compiler for Windows 2000, and I am going to use Pro Compaq Fortran. By the way, I should invert my current graphics to OpenGL in a year or two. Have you ever used VC++ along with OGL.

Selina Tracy.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2001, 20:31
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #10
Sebastien Perron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes I did. It can be done in three ways:

1) use the GLUT library without any MFC classes and be able to compile your code with any UNIX system along with a WIN9.X system (this the way I prefer)

2) use the wgl extensions along with MFC classes. Your api will be better but you won't be able to export your code.

3) use wxindows classes (or other open source API classes available both win9.X and unix). You will also be able to export your code.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2001, 14:27
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #11
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). OpenGL Programming Guide,Mason Woo, (2). OpenGL Programming for the X Window System ,Mark Kilgard, (3).OpenGL Programming for Windows 95 and Windows NT,Ron Fosner (4).OpenGL SuperBible, Richard Wright.Jr. (5).These are all very good books. The last one is very good with many samples. The first one is the official user's guide. And you can also visit the OpenGL homepage, with tutorials.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2001, 14:33
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #12
Olivier Braun
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Sebastien,

Sorry, Sebastien, but I disagree with your opinion in the last sentence, erhh, not the one about the humans and the computers, but the question what code is easier to understand. Sure, the automatically generated stuff is not really easy to understand, but it is a kind of standard reused and reused many times, it is quite well documented. To understand what goes on under the hood in the MFC I recommend "Programming Windows with MFC" by Jeff Prosise to start. This might be sufficient for most of the things we (engineers and scientists) demand from a nice GUI. I beieve hand-written code gave me a lot more headaches than the MFC stuff generated by the App wizard. Anyway, I' d like to add that there are two nice developer sites I would like to mention, you can find all kinds of VC++ related stuff, free code samples and so on: www.codeguru.com and www.codeproject.com.

Have fun,

Olivier

"In C we encoded our own bugs, in C++ we inherit them"
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2001, 18:58
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #13
Sebastien Perron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree that the application Wizard will speed up things when building a small or medium code. But, if you desing a code that will be modified by others it is not as usefull and can lead to major problems. But, it might be possible to use it wisely if you have a very good understanding of the tool. I had some experiences with codes written by others who, I beleive, were not aware that the code would one day be maintained by others...

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2001, 14:17
Default Re: Compiler for Windows2000
  #14
Olivier Braun
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Seb,

Using the app wizard always speeds up things, whatever the size of your project is. But I agree with you that one should be aware of what it does for you at any moment. I suggest to anyone to read (at least) the Prosise (or Kruglinskys Inside VC++) to know what the wizard does for you. So you can use it to generate code efficiently if appropriated, and enhance your code to your needs afterwards. In fact I think app wizard is quite poor in handling non-mfc things, but that is definetely not what it was made for. Finally it' s like any other tool. You don't have to use a CNC-milling machine to drill a single hole, if you have 10.000 flanges with 12 holes each, it might be worth a reflection...

Cheers

Olivier
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found piprus OpenFOAM Installation 22 February 25, 2010 13:43
Fortran compiler Erik CD-adapco 2 November 28, 2008 20:05
Intel compiler for linux x86 marcus CD-adapco 1 November 9, 2006 16:43
Fluent 6.2 and gcc compiler in Sun Blade 2500 Nitu Gupta FLUENT 8 April 29, 2005 13:58
Fortran compiler Arnab CD-adapco 5 September 14, 2004 03:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:44.