CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Turbulent viscosity

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 20, 2001, 03:04
Default Turbulent viscosity
  #1
Christian Holm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi.

I have made a simulation upon a rectangular box. Inlet in one end, and outlet in the other end. Inlet vel. is approx. 20 m/s. There are no temperature differences. The problem is that I get a too high turbulent viscosity (the turbulent/laminar viscosity ratio is limited to approx. 10^5). I first considered that it could be due to a too fine grid combined with a "coarse" turbulent model (k-e model), so I tried with a coarser grid. No effect. I have also tried other models (RS, LES) but it did not do the trick (well, the LES did with a good initial guess).

Q: Is it true that there are problems with combining a fine grid with a "coarse" turbulent model? Q: Do anyone have suggestions as to solve the high turbulent viscosity problem?

I would appreciate comments to the two questions.

Cheers Christian

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2001, 08:36
Default Re: Turbulent viscosity
  #2
Alexey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In fact turbulent/laminar viscosity ratio=10^5 is typical value. Don't worry. For instance, in my numerical simulations of supersonic turbulent jets flowing into atmosphere I got maximum dynamic turbulent viscosity approx 0.5 Pa*sec (molecular vis is about 1e-5 Pa*sec). I used Menter's k-w model and got good agreements with experiments.

Alexey.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2001, 05:09
Default Re: Turbulent viscosity
  #3
Christian Holm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I would think that the more turbulent the flow is, the higher the ratio. And I guess that supersonic can be considered very turbulent, and a high ratio could be expected. My case on the other hand is not that turbulent, and I am just surprised that the ratio is that high, and I am afraid that it might contaminate the solution. I can see that the convergence is more stable when I lower the inlet vel. Do you have any suggestions what to do about a potentially too high viscosity ratio ?

Christian
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2001, 13:38
Default Re: Turbulent viscosity
  #4
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). Take the flow over a flat plate as a test case. (2). Run some cases of flat plate flow, refine the mesh, and check the results against the test data.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2001, 22:04
Default Re: Turbulent viscosity
  #5
zhou_eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Try to check the mesh quality, by means of the distributions and values of the y-plus and y-star.

Good luck,
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reversed flow at pressure inlet and turbulent viscosity is limited.... cfdiscool FLUENT 10 June 10, 2015 06:15
Turbulent viscosity and shear rate shib FLUENT 0 June 22, 2010 12:44
Link between eddy viscosity and subgrid-scale turbulent viscosity in LES Marvin Main CFD Forum 6 December 4, 2009 12:08
setting value of turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio in wind tunnel nuimlabib Main CFD Forum 0 August 4, 2009 00:05
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited David Yang FLUENT 3 June 3, 2002 06:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:04.