# turbulence modeling for external aerodynamics

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 26, 2001, 03:24 turbulence modeling for external aerodynamics #1 Charles Renard Guest   Posts: n/a Hi ! I would like to know what are the best choices to model turbulence in an external aerodynamics problem around an aotomotive vehicle. For example which values are commonly taken for turb. intensity, or K , or epsilon, or .... I noticed we need to define two values in Fluent. Thanks Charles

 June 26, 2001, 10:19 Re: turbulence modeling for external aerodynamics #2 andy Guest   Posts: n/a Unless you have something that sharply defines the separation off the rear of vehicle, do not transport significant levels of k into the stagnation region at the front of the vehicle, etc... I would suggest that the standard k-e model is not a wise choice if a reliable prediction of the flow over a ground vehicle is required. The value of boundary conditions for k and e is determined by the conditions you wish to simulate: smooth air, gusty conditions, velocity of vehicle, etc... Your question is not answerable without further information. I would suggest the FLUENT support desk or a local experienced CFD user is probably your best bet for getting you up to speed with understanding this sort of thing.

 June 27, 2001, 03:29 Re: turbulence modeling for external aerodynamics #3 Charles Renard Guest   Posts: n/a Well I already had a discusion with a Fluent guy and we chose Realizable k-eps for my concern. i just want to simulate the speed of the vehicle ( about 90 km/h) in "normal conditions". My needs are the typical values for the definition of turbulence in the entry box for velocity inlet boundary condition. i hope you will understand a little more thanks by advance.

 June 27, 2001, 07:55 Re: turbulence modeling for external aerodynamics #4 andy Guest   Posts: n/a If you are happy with the advice from the FLUENT man then stick with it. What does he suggest you use for your turbulent boundary conditions? If I were to tell you 42.456576 and 789.345789 would this really get you any further or help with the next problem? Is my advice trustworthy? What aspects of the predicition you are going to get will be reasonable and which will not? (You can be sure your simulation will not get everything 100% correct). I was trying to suggest previously that you need to tap into a source of information on how to go about performing CFD simulations. Bite sized answers on CFD Online is not really going to provide that.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ezsoal OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 November 26, 2009 16:12 max91 CFX 1 July 29, 2008 20:28 erdem CD-adapco 4 August 9, 2006 10:44 Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 0 May 6, 2006 19:08 llowen Main CFD Forum 3 September 11, 1998 04:24

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:23.