CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Surface roughness

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 10, 2001, 18:17
Default Surface roughness
  #1
Peter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi to all,

Some engineers insist that surface roughness is a manufacturing parameter and that should be taken into account only when the piece is build up. My question is: how this parameter is considered when using CFD, for instance when doing airfoil design?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2001, 19:40
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1).In airfoil design, surface is considered smooth. so, the roughness is not considered. (2). Roughness is a problem for pipes (casting or machined), so there are charts and tables to account for the loss, see Schlichting's book of The boundary layer theory for details.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2001, 06:07
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #3
Michael Malin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When using high-Reynolds-number turbulence models in CFD, wall-roughness effects are simulated by the specification of an equivalent "sand-grain" roughness height (as mentioned by John Chien), or alternatively by means of an effective roughness height as in, for example, atmospheric boundary layers where the effective height is related to the size of the roughness elements on the surface terrain.

With 'sand-grain' roughness, the 'roughness' parameter for a smooth wall E is a constant in the log law, and for a rough wall E is expressed as a function of the roughness Reynolds number by means of empirical laws based on the work of Nikuradse(Schlichting's book) and others.

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2001, 13:28
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #4
Peter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is clear that in pipes, surface roughness is important and there are correlations for that. My question was focused in airfoil profiles, since I know people working on that does not take it into account any surface roughness considering that the wall is smooth. To which extent that assumption is valid?? Can interpolating splines for the geometry introduce any surface roughness in CFD??

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2001, 15:53
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #5
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). In airfoil design, or CAD, the cubic is commonly used standard. (2). Other has used quartics or slightly higher order, but they normally do not introduce surface roughness. (3). Spline curve with higher order can introduce strange shapes, so care must be taken there. SO, if you use cubic or quartic, you should be all right. (that is, limit the control points to four or five points per curve segment)
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2001, 17:26
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #6
Peter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
People I contacted do use cubic splines. That is probably the reason why they don't consider surface roughness at all.

OK
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2001, 03:16
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #7
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Has anybody any experience in modelling two-phase induced pressure losses with surface roughness? I mean modelling a very thin liquid film in a gas stream by surface roughness. The exchange of impuls between gas and liquid could be captured with a surface roughness. Anybody?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 13, 2001, 11:32
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #8
ken elms
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Surface finish by a manufacturing process is important for numerous reasons from fitting together components to handling processes flows. Hydraulic pump impellers from practical everyday uses to the basis [assumptions- in flow modelling and navier stokes equations etc. SCHLICHTING-1979],PIPE FLOW EQUATIONS[ROUGHNESS FACTORS-CONCRETE,PLASTICS,STEEL,ETC]. Its not just for engineers either.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2001, 11:56
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #9
Khurram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am intersted in validation of skin friction drag obtained from CFD. can any body help me?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2001, 11:29
Default Re: Surface roughness
  #10
Herve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am too! My experience is that for low ks/ks+ it is in general quite possible to relate physical and num. roughness values. When roughness is high or complex, it is difficult to relate both.The grain roughness approache doesn't work anymore...

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with Gmsh nishant_hull Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 23 August 5, 2015 02:09
nutRoughWallFunction and Surface Roughness Documented AlanR OpenFOAM Programming & Development 48 July 31, 2015 02:47
Error : Self intersecting surface mesh, computing intersections & Error : Impossible velan Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 1 July 14, 2015 05:54
Surface roughness alefem FLOW-3D 6 June 3, 2010 12:49
CFX4.3 -build analysis form Chie Min CFX 5 July 12, 2001 23:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:15.