|
[Sponsors] |
August 5, 2001, 21:42 |
the B.C. for AUSM(DV)
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hello,everyone, I'm working on the FV method for turbulent reactive flows on unstructure grids.I use AUSMDV and AUSM to solve the inviscid flux.The B.C. works well with Roe's scheme.But when using AUSM(DV),it's divergent by the boundary even if CFL number is very small. I treat solid bodies by no-slip boundary condition(u_n=0),and treat infinite boundaries by a characteristic technique.It worked well with Roe's approximate Riemann solver. .Must I modify it to fit AUSMDV?If yes,how to do it?
|
|
August 12, 2001, 20:44 |
Re: the B.C. for AUSM(DV)
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I had no chance to use AUSM, but in my guess if the solution converges for Roe scheme, AUSM should also converge. It's just my guess.
Have you ever seen a paper on wall boundary condition ? Why don't you read this paper ? (this deals with slip B.C. for the flux function of Roe, van Leer and kinetic flux function) WALL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR INVISCID COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS ON UNSTRUCTURED MESHES, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 28: 1481?501 (1998) Regards. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Confusion between 'non-slip' and 'slip' B.C | jinwon park | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 6, 2008 05:56 |
how to set such B.C. in Fluent? | Sherri | FLUENT | 1 | January 12, 2006 13:32 |
Urgent! Help on UDF to set B.C. of 3rd type | Ray Hong | FLUENT | 0 | December 28, 2005 20:35 |
How to set B.C. of the 2nd or 3rd type in UDS? | Ray Hong | FLUENT | 0 | December 28, 2005 07:03 |
Non-Reflecting B.C. in NSC2KE | Zou Chu | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 27, 1999 22:26 |