
[Sponsors] 
August 7, 2001, 21:39 
Help need on fluxes

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

hi,there, I want to simulate the fluid field around a hexagonal section using the FVM and projection method(incompressible),when I deduce the FVM difference formuation,i met a problem: in order to expedite the code,i must use MG method,so the mesh which can be formed by Phoenics is appreciated,in which grid are in Cartesian coordinates but not all mesh are orthogonal,in other word,nonorthogonal Cartesian coordinate system with unequal grid space,when i integrate the equ. over the finite volume and after applying the Green's theoren,the advective term (dE/dx,dF/dy) now become E and F ,which are the fluxes on the center of the interface of the finite volume,while the diffusion term can be integrated without any difficulty,the difficult is how can i determine the spatial values of the fluxes on the interface of the finite volume,for the accuracy and stablity,i cannot use the averaged values(central difference) and first order upwind scheme,i donot know how to deal with this problem,how the Phoenics deals with this kind of problemes,does it use hybrid scheme(Patankar)?how the bybrid scheme works on nonorthogonal Cartesian coordinate system with unequal grid space on FVM.
thanks Zhu 

August 8, 2001, 03:28 
Re: Help need on fluxes

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

As you stated, if you use an arithmetic mean flux of two adjacent cell as an interfacial (convective) flux, you may face some problems related to numerical oscillations. In FVM, this problem is concerned with the classical Riemann problem. When you calculate inviscid fluxes through a cell edge, you should use an approximate or sometimes exact Riemann solver to calculate them. There are many solvers such as Roe, HLL and LF etc. Patankar's techniques will not help. In addition, to obtain secondorder spatial accuarcy, you'd better adopt MUSCLtype slope limiting technique. It can be implemented on arbitrary grid. Finally, to integrate semidiscret equations various time integration techniques are employed.
Best Regards, SeokKoo Kang 

August 8, 2001, 22:35 
Re: Help need on fluxes

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thanks,SeokKoo Kang,before I got your information,i want to use 2ndorder upwind scheme to calculate the fluxes on the interfaces of the finite volume,because my code will deal with unsteady flow,implicit scheme must be used,but i donot know how to write the flux in a uniform(or common) formulation when the advective coff.>0 or <0,will this situation also meet in the Riemann,or something like that? while,i beg you give me some reference focusing on what you said. best regards, Zhu


August 9, 2001, 06:08 
Re: Help need on fluxes

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

It is not straightforward to use Riemann solver for solving incompressible NS equations and continuity equaiton on unstructured grids, for the PDEs are not hyperbolic due to absence of time derivative term in the continuity equation. Riemann sovlers, in general, needs information on the eigenstructures of PDEs. If you want to solve these equations by those used in compressible flows calculations, I think pseudocompressibility methods is a good choice.
If your problem of interest is not convectiondominated, actually, Riemann solver is not necessary. You can calculate the interfacial flux by simply averaging two neighboring fluxes and multiply unit outward normal vector. In 2D, the normal flux through a cell face is ( (F_left, G_left) + (F_right, G_right) ) dot (nx, ny) = ( (F_left + F_right)Nx + (G_left + G_right)Ny )/2. The sign of the flux is determined automatically. If the upwind scheme is used, ( (F_left, G_left) + (F_right, G_right) ) dot (nx, ny) = ( (F_left + F_right)Nx + (G_left + G_right)Ny )/2  (A, B) dot (Nx, Ny) ( U_right  U_left ) / 2 (See Hirsch's book), where U is a conserved variable and A, B are the jacobian matrices. In this case, the sign changes automatically due to the absolute operator. In case you use MUSCLtype method, you should reconstruct variables for each cell, so that it is distributed linearly. I'm not sure that these will be helpful but provide you a little references. A Projection Method for Incompressible Viscous Flow on Moving Quadrilateral Grids, J. Comp. Phys., 166, 191217 (2001) A staggered control volume scheme for unstructured triangular grids,INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, VOL. 25, 697717 (1997). A conservative finitevolume secondorderaccurate projection method on hybrid unstructured grids, J. Comp. Phys., 150, 4075 (1999) 

August 9, 2001, 23:12 
Re: Help need on fluxes

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

hi,thanks for your guide, for the Reo scheme,i have read through it,it is difficult to implement, compared with other simple fluxes calculation method,on other hand,what i simulate is unsteady impressible viscid flow,which need a large number of time step's results,maybe the speed of my code with 2nd order Reo scheme will restrict me.
from the simulation of impressible viscid flow around a body,i finally want to calculate the force acting on a body at each time step,there are reversed flow in the domain,i am not sure if i must use 2ndorder scheme to obtain good result,how about the frist order Reo method?any suggestion will be appreciated. thanks 

August 10, 2001, 17:01 
Re: Help need on fluxes

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

It is undoubtable that higherorder method gives more accurate result. If it is possible, using higherorder accurate method is more desirable, I think.
And Roe's flux function does not need excessive computation time. It may looks complicated bu you might need just a little computation time. Because you solve 2D inviscid flow, compuation time will not take much inspite of its unstediness. There are plenty of choices to solve your problem : pressurevelocity coupling method, FEM, pojection method, upwindFVM/FDM with pseudocompressibility method, etc. Each has both advantages and disadvantages. Please read papers and make up your mind. The choice depends on you. 

August 11, 2001, 21:29 
Re: Help need on fluxes

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

dear Kang Seok KooŁ¬thanks for you help,maybe,in the thread i posted,i didnot discribed my simulation clearly,what i deal with is viscid incompressible flow,because i am familar with projection method,so FVM will used with projection method.
the trouble come from the irregular domain,the domain is fluid flowing around irregular body,the cell will be structural quadrilateral,some arenot rectangle,now i am not sure about the follwing things: 1.for impressible flow,i think the secondorder upwind scheme which is derivated from Reo scheme is enough,because i willnot meet discontinutiy,so the MUSCL or something like TVD are not necessary. 2.can fluxes extropolation(evaluetion) be used implicitly?for unsteady flow,the large time step is more appreciated. 3.for arbitry quadrilateral cell with one side having an angle of 45 degree to xdirection,i am not sure how to extropolating the flux like rho*v*fai,here,rho is the density,v is the convective velocity in ydirection,and fai is the scalar,should this fluxes be extropolated in x or ydirection ? thanks for your time Zhu 

August 12, 2001, 10:14 
Re: Help need on fluxes

#8 
Guest
Posts: n/a

For an extrapolation of variables on arbitrary grids, see the papers I commented before. Two of the papers are related to projection method. I strongly recommend you to see the paper of Kobayashi et al. (J. Comp. Phys, 150, 1999). You may be able to see detailed information on what you wonder. It is a good idea to follow the procedure described there.
If the flow is not concerned with shock, you do not need to think about Riemann solver. There are several choices for implicit method. The most stable is firstorder backward Euler method. You can also you a secondorder backward differentiation. Using higher than thirdorder implicit method is not frequent. Best Regards. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
CANTERA code to get pure species mass fluxes  gemmafebrer  Main CFD Forum  0  October 19, 2010 11:42 
Viscous fluxes in a Riemann HLLC solver  Bryce Sharman  Main CFD Forum  5  July 8, 2009 23:29 
Fluxes of scalars at wall faces  K Sanjay  Phoenics  10  August 15, 2005 10:45 
simple turbulence fluxes for FV  dominique  Main CFD Forum  1  April 22, 2004 13:29 
Roe upwind fluxes!!  Magesh  Main CFD Forum  2  July 17, 2003 11:35 