# Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 31, 2001, 06:44 Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain #1 Robin Sanderson Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I am very much new to these things so please excuse my ignorance. Background: I need to solve the unsteady Stokes equations in a liquid bridge between two spheres. Assuming axisymmetry and fore-aft symmetry this leaves a domain with two flat sides (the centrelines), one side that is the arc of a circle, and one side that is a curved free surface, intersecting the circular arc with a contact angle that can be small (almost 0). Note that all boundaries are stationary. The basic question: is it possible to obtain a grid that will allow me to solve the equations using the F.D. method despite the fairly acute corner of the domain? Sorry to waffle, thanks. Rob

 August 31, 2001, 12:48 Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain #2 Abhijit Tosh Guest   Posts: n/a As Finite Difference requires structured grid, the Transfinite Interpolation (TFI) Method of Grid generation may be employed for this problem. For important corner points, clustering around that corner would be suitable.

 September 1, 2001, 14:36 Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain #3 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). Why not take a look at Joe Thompson's book "Numerical Grid Generation", available free on Internet, with Fortran codes attached including various schemes.

 September 3, 2001, 08:58 Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain #4 Robin Sanderson Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks to everyone for their replies. Does anyone out their know of any textbooks that address the problem of sharp corners in domains, and/or anything good on finite volume methods?

 September 3, 2001, 10:01 Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain #5 Peter liang Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Robin: The FV method can accomodate any kinds of grid. Therefore, it's suitable for complex geometries. The grid defines only the Control Volume(CV) boundaries, and need not be related to a coordinate systems. If CVs boundary is the same as the surface integrals which represent convective n' diffusive fluxes, the F.V. method is conservative. Disadvantages of F.V. method: FV requires two levels of approximation: interpolation n' integration, difficult to develop in 3D (Ref: Book " Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics", J.H.Ferziger). Hope this helps. Peter

 September 3, 2001, 10:03 Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain #6 Peter liang Guest   Posts: n/a what's the hyperlink for this book, John? Many thanx. peter

 September 3, 2001, 10:08 Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain #7 Robin Sanderson Guest   Posts: n/a Numerical Grid Generation by Thompson, Warsi and Mastin is available at http://www.erc.msstate.edu/education/gridbook/

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post vasu Main CFD Forum 6 March 24, 2011 08:22 xujjun CFX 9 June 9, 2009 08:59 Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55 George Main CFD Forum 0 June 4, 2003 14:08 Robert Schneiders Main CFD Forum 0 March 2, 1999 05:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:42.