|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am working with compressible Navier-Stokes equations and I want to compute forced compressible turbulence for Mach number <1..
I would like to have some suggestions or references about the choice of the forcing term. thanks in advance, christelle |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm not sure of what you mean with "forced". Could you please clarify that?
Generally speaking you don't have a lot of compressibility effects on the turbulence for Mach numbers below 1. For flows below the hypersonic range (M ~< 3) you can usually neglect things like pressure dilatation, pressure work and pressure diffusion and just use "incompressible" turbulence models, provided you formulate them in a correct conservative formulation. I'm working with turbulence modeling for supersonic flows (heat transfer in supersonic turbines, max Mach ~ 2), so I share your interest in compressible turbulence modeling. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I will clarify the point "forced compressible turbulence"
I want to compute a isotropic turbulence but not decaying in time . So I must add a forcing term in compressible Navier-Stokes equations to make the flow stationary. I don't want to get by adding this term non physical compressible effects . The flow must stay incompressible (M<1) and I would like to know wich forcing term I could use to have these properties. thanks for responses. christelle |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question on Turbulence Intensity | Eric | FLUENT | 1 | March 7, 2012 04:30 |
| Turbulence postprocessing | Mohsin | FLUENT | 0 | September 19, 2011 21:05 |
| Turbulent Kinetic Energy | Jabe | FLUENT | 3 | February 27, 2011 18:40 |
| Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 09:52 |
| Code release: Flow Transition and Turbulence | Chaoqun Liu | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 26, 2008 17:15 |