CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

2-cycle engine modeling

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 15, 2001, 14:25
Default 2-cycle engine modeling
  #1
Roy Perryman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What CFD packages are available that will accurately model the combustion and scavenging processes (for 1 complete crank rotation) of a piston-ported 2-cycle engine? Ease of use is important, as I have never used a CFD program before. Also, any literature suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance for your input.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2001, 16:24
Default Re: 2-cycle engine modeling
  #2
King Tut
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
you best bet is KIVA.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2001, 19:37
Default Re: 2-cycle engine modeling
  #3
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). Good Grief! Can't you just visit the sponsor's websites? or type "two-stroke engine cfd simulation" into the search engine?
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2001, 02:00
Default Re: 2-cycle engine modeling,a short comment.
  #4
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). There is no future for CFD, as long as CFD is interpreted as code development and code running. (2). After reading one book on FrontPage three times last couple of weeks, and begining to read another FrontPage reference book, I think, item-1 is going to be my conclusion based on my observation. (you don't have to follow my comment) (3). The obvious difference is: in the FrontPage case, I can get exactly what I want, by following the instruction. And it really helps me a lot, even though I know how to use HTML. (4). Based on my experience with the commercial CFD codes or in-house CFD codes, life was really miserable in running the so-called CFD codes in real life. (5). In other words, using FrontPage, you get happiness out of using it, while using CFD codes, you get more un-answered problems and questions. Your question reflects this kind of fear, which is rather common in the running-CFD-code environment. (6). So, if this can be called the current approach, then it is fundamentally wrong related to CFD field. (7). The two-stroke engine is a complex problem. It is transient, moving boundary, compressible, turbulent and reacting flow. In this case, it would be easier to take the experimental approach, that is trial-and-error approach. And I had used a two-stroke engine lawn mower for over ten years. It is simple and reliable. (8). The best we can do today is, simple turbulent flows with favorable pressure gradient. With the adverse pressure gradient, most turbulence models will give wrong solutions. With moving boundary, and reacting flows, you probably need a super-computer of your own. (9). I still think that CFD is a death trap. The trouble is, you are pretending that you know how to solve the problem and that all you need is a CFD code. In reality, to solve a simple square cavity with a moving wall alone(3-D) is easily a PhD dissertation subject. Even if it is very accurate, who is going to hire you? to do what? (10). I am sure that there are special cases. So, if you are one of them, then you are the exception. Even in aircraft aerodynamic design, the CFD results are largely used to confirm the huge data base of testing. (in other words, it is extra work to show that testing is all right.) I am sure that there are ways to do it right, but that is something else. If you need a CFD code to run, you can not go very far at all. You will get stuck. Anyway, I will have to stop here and go back to do more reading about the FrontPage.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2001, 05:37
Default Re: 2-cycle engine modeling,a short comment.
  #5
bala
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi John! I totally agree with you. Now nearly every engineering student pretends that s/he knows how to solve a fluid mechanics' problem and all that is needed is a CFD code. Using a CFD code is taught on undergraduate course in the name of teaching CFD. The students acquire little or no knowledge of basic fluid mechanics and fluid dynamics. They can't see that for many problems they can use analytical solutions of simplified variations of N-S =ns and don't need to solve full set of =ns.

I don't know if computational solid mechanics codes are propagated in a same manner.

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modeling Hyrogen Sealing in an internal combustion Engine anatoliafire Main CFD Forum 0 May 3, 2010 02:40
Intrenal combustion engine (CI) modeling Majid FLUENT 0 August 2, 2009 09:04
I.C. Engine Modeling Abdel-Fattah M. Mahrous CD-adapco 1 April 23, 2005 01:13
1-D Engine Network Modeling Zamir Main CFD Forum 10 November 24, 2004 04:18
Simulation of a four stroke engine cycle Alfred Herman.S. CD-adapco 1 May 27, 2002 07:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:10.