CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

subgrid models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 17, 2001, 09:57
Default subgrid models
  #1
V. G. Ferreira
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Dear Friends,

Is the K-Epsilon model a subgrid model?

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2001, 10:15
Default Re: subgrid models
  #2
Lionel Larcheveque
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I think the turbulent viscosity computed using the k-eps model cannot be considered as a subgrid viscosity because it doesn't vanish even if all the turbulent scales are resolved .

best regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2001, 11:00
Default Re: subgrid models
  #3
chidu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The standard k-eps model was developed for time-averaged equations. The term sub-grid models is normally used in the context of space-filtered simulations or Large eddy simulations.

Now, people have used sub-grid k-eps models too. Where they solve additional equations for the sub-grid 'k' and sub-grid 'eps'. This is useful for some reasons like 'control of back-scatter of energy' maybe.

chidu...
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2001, 15:18
Default subgrid models for 2D ?
  #4
Capi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

there are subgrid scale models proper for 2D simulations (2D-LES)??
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2001, 06:11
Default Re: subgrid models for 2D ?
  #5
chidu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The 2D Les concept has been used as a cheap and dirty alternative to doing a full 3D simulation. I don't know what it means in a flow situation that actually involves three-dimensional turbulence. I think in such cases (mostly in the industry) people just use the same sub-grid scale models as they have for their 3D simulation. The best way to look at literature.

Of course, in principle, the LES concept can be applied to a problem in any number of dimensions.

chidu...
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2001, 11:10
Default Re: subgrid models for 2D ?
  #6
indi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
subgrid model concepts has been developed in LES that is essentially spatial filtering of turbulent flow-field. LES does not removed the 3d fluctuation of turbulent. Thus performing LES (using 2D subgrid model) would be pointless as the simulation is definitely innaccurate. (See study by Michael Brauer, e.g. his paper in ECCOMAS 2000)

Currently there is some attempt to make LES cheap by combining it with RANS concept, e.g. Detached Eddy Simulation of Spallart. Within this framework, "2D subgrid scale" has been developed. More information on this can be found in onera and cerfacs website.

Cheers
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2001, 13:31
Default Re: subgrid models
  #7
kalyan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Backscatter is possible in the context of eddy viscosity models (like the K-e model) only is the eddy viscosity coefficient C_mu is negative (since K and e are by definition positive). Therefore, with fixed positive C_mu, there can not be any backscatter (in 2 or 3 dimensions).
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2001, 13:56
Default Re: subgrid models
  #8
chidu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeah, but is there a contradiction here? If you fix C_mu to be positive then of course there will be no back-scatter. I never said that one has to fix C_mu to be positive. In the case that you allow it go negative, using a sub-grid k-eps model allows some flexibility!

In many cases anyways the fact that C_mu goes negative is a wierdness of the model rather than physical back-scatter. Personally I don't believe LES models capture back-scatter well. I was just making a point.

Rereading your email, are you talking about RANS models? I was talking about LES!!

chidu...
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2001, 17:53
Default Re: subgrid models
  #9
kalyan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was referring to LES models as well.

And of course, I agree with your opinion that physical backscatter, despite what many LES researchers (some well regarded) say, has nothing to do with C_mu going negative. I can state the reasons behind my belief if some one wants to refute them. Perhaps you could do the same if any one shows interest.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2001, 15:53
Default Re: subgrid models for 2D ?
  #10
Capi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
more references please
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incompressible Turbulence models achinta OpenFOAM 4 May 27, 2010 10:35
Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows Hansong Tang Main CFD Forum 6 December 8, 2009 04:21
informaiton about k-omega models krisreddi CFX 2 August 10, 2005 06:53
CFD models Xie Main CFD Forum 0 April 18, 2002 13:48
Dynamic Subgrid Models Bono Main CFD Forum 2 November 27, 2001 17:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38.