|
[Sponsors] |
November 11, 2001, 13:50 |
Benchmark for Gauss-Seidel method
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello to everybody. I need some benchmarks, in terms of number of iterations vs. number of nodes, for a Gauss-Seidel solver for 2D Laplace equation on a cartesian grid using double precision. The problem I would like them for is standard: x = 1 on boundary, initial guess is 0 and no production (hey, it' s Laplace ), but numbers relative to any standard problem will do the same. I know from theory that the behaviour should asimptotically approach linearity, and I did write a routine myself, whose results show the correct behaviour but, since I need this for a research project, I would like to have actual, absolutely error-proof numbers. If you know them, or if you can provide a good reference, or if you can address me to a routine which is surely bug-free, please let me know ASAP. Thanks in advance,
Andrea Panizza |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] discretizer - gmshToFoam | Andyjoe | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | March 14, 2012 04:35 |
Fluent 6.3.26 vs 12.1 and partition method | Anorky | FLUENT | 0 | April 27, 2010 10:55 |
Comparison: Finite Volume Method vs. Analytic Method | m-fry | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 20, 2010 14:40 |
Code for most powerfull FDV Method | D.S.Nasan | Main CFD Forum | 6 | September 4, 2008 02:08 |
Help about the preconditioner in gmres method | Dan Gao | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 5, 2008 01:18 |