essence of upwinding
I EVER believed that upwinding is an effective means to introduce numerical dissipation into the scheme. It is also this numerical dissipation that makes upwinding diserable in shock capturing.
-Are these claims correct?
However, as we known, Lax-Friedrichs is a contral method, and it is more dissipative than the first-order upwind scheme.
How to justify the effect of upwinding of a numerical scheme? For dissipation or for the correct influence domain?
Re: essence of upwinding
Both claims are correct!
In my opinion, dissipation and influence domain go hand in hand (please read my post below yours, which tries to explain inviscid drag).
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:34.|