CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Regarding a suitable scheme for BFC

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 17, 2001, 06:38
Default Regarding a suitable scheme for BFC
  #1
Abhijeet Vaidya
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello, I want to develope a 3-d code which will be a flow solver with turbulence and spray models and based on the transformed equations ( solver for a body fitted grid ). Since in finite volume method, there are a huge number of schemes, I am feeling confused because each has its own advantages & disadvantages. Out of all algorithms, I have decide that I will use either K.C.Karki's (1988, karki & patankar, NHT publication ) scheme, based on staggered grid or S.Mujumdar's scheme, which is based on non staggered scheme of Rhie and Chow ! Though the non staggered scheme approach looks simpler, I am not feeling confident whether it will really be stable or will it give problems regarding convergence ( specifically as I have to solve spray also). Kindly guide me for this ! Thanking you !
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2001, 08:43
Default Re: Regarding a suitable scheme for BFC
  #2
John
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The non-staggered grid approach is used by all major FV-based commercial CFD codes and it proves to be fine. I would be interested to know why you think it will cause problem with sprays since codes like STAR-CD (from Computational Dynamics), VECTIS (from Ricardo) and FIRE (from AVL) all used successfully for internal engine combustions.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2001, 01:55
Default Re: Regarding a suitable scheme for BFC
  #3
Abhijeet Mohan Vaidya
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Jon Thanks for your reply. But after the literature survey I found that first non staggered scheme was proposed by Rhie and Chow, then it was critised by S. Majumdar and he proposed his own scheme. The scheme of S. Majumdar was later critised by Date, and he put his own scheme.Later Date critised his own scheme and put another scheme. Due to all this I am not feeling confident about choosing some.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2001, 07:39
Default Re: Regarding a suitable scheme for BFC
  #4
frederic Felten
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi there,

If you wanna choose between the two approach, either staggered or collocated in curvilinear coordinates, take a look at the paper i wrote. You can download this paper at the following address: http://utacfdi.uta.edu/~felten/resume/taicdl_art.ps

I'm sure that you will find this paper very interesting in helping you choosing which approach you wanna use. Sincerely,

Frederic Felten.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2001, 13:15
Default Re: Regarding a suitable scheme for BFC
  #5
andy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Given your apparent starting point I would strongly suggest obtaining a working code and adapting it. KIVA seems an obvious choice given your interest in sprays but there are several others.

Non-staggered schemes are usually significantly simpler to code. In general, convergence/stability is not a major concern. A much bigger problem is poor accuracy in the presence of significant non-linear pressure gradients. If your application has significant swirl then it might be a good idea to look at other schemes or, at least, move away from the large amount of pressure smoothing introduced by a "straight" Rhie & Chow scheme.

I would also advise not going into print stating that Rhie & Chow introduced the first non-staggered scheme. For example, many compressible methods and many finite element methods were non-staggered in the 20 odd years prior to Rhie&Chow. The paper seems to have had a large impact because around that time most groups with working incompressible staggered codes were looking to move to general body-fitted coordinates and having problems with the practicalities of using covariant or contravariant base vectors.

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it suitable to use Weller's scheme in this case? kaifu OpenFOAM 5 June 22, 2011 08:09
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) Far FLUENT 0 May 22, 2011 01:50
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
Poisson Solver or suitable scheme Tingting Main CFD Forum 1 August 4, 2006 06:47
Which scheme is suitable for NS under vacuum? Zhihang Zhang Main CFD Forum 1 January 21, 2004 20:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:42.