CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

CFD-Pro/Engineer

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 29, 2001, 10:27
Default CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #1
Teo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does anyone know which CFD package is cooperative with Pro/Engineer design software? Thanks in advance!
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2001, 11:45
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #2
Mike Clapp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Take a look at CFdesign for Pro/Engineer. Point your browser at www.CFdesign.com.

Regards

Mike Clapp
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 31, 2001, 09:23
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #3
Peter Spalding
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think you will find that several CFD codes are compatible with Pro/Engineer.

For example, Pro/Engineer can create STL solid models which can then be exported directly into the PHOENICS VR interface.

Peter
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2002, 08:34
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #4
An Modh Coinniolach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You can export step files (*.st*p) from Pro/E and import them into Gambit (preprocessor for FLuent)
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2002, 12:10
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #5
C. Lafferty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Good Luck finding a package that will interface directly with ProE. As you probably know ProE is great at creating the part; however, if you want the fluid domain it may require several weeks of work by either internal or external ProE experts. There are several methods to create the fluid domain on simple parts (pipes, valves, connectors, etc.); however, if you go to large assemblies (i.e. auto underhoods) it takes lots of time, due to the gaps between components. Once you have the fluid domain, you can export it to either .stl, .vda, .step, .unv, etc. of which one of many the major commerical CFD could probably import.

Please see other replies for codes and prefered import file format.

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2002, 12:36
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #6
David
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

The ICEM CFD preprocessor links directly to PROE. Its more than just a translator. It actually sits inside the PROE system. The ICEM CFD preprocessor can then export to almost every solver including Fluent, CFX and STAR.

You can find out more at www.icemcfd.co.uk

Regards

David
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2002, 19:03
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #7
Jeff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
CFdesign is fully integrated within Pro/Engineer and requires no geometry translation.

Pro/E offers several methods of creating the "fluid volume" from the most complicated of assemblies. These techniques are part of the basic functionality of Pro/E and can be easily performed by a novice.

I strongly recommend that you NOT export models through the various translation formats. They tend to corrupt geometry and may require weeks of work to "heal" and recreate the geometry in the downstream application. It is always best to use a package that works with the native Pro/E geometry.

Jeff
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2002, 07:07
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #8
Fred Uckfield
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jeff, are you saying that CFDesign directly discretises the native ProE geometry model? Surely there must be some translation into a form that your solver understands?

It used to take weeks to heal and 'pamper' exported geometry but with the uptake of STEP, the maturity of the various solid modelling kernals and translator softwares data translation is NOT the problem it used to be.

Anyway, the real issue is the fact that the geometric description required for efficient analysis is rarely a 1 to 1 mapping of the geometry that exists in the MCAD tool, especially if production quality MCAD models require analysis. This is a far more common occurence than the MCAD tool being used just as an analysis preprocessor which seems to be how CFDesign is being applied. So, I doubt the the productivity gains BRNI talk about are realised in practise, in real design environments, on real industrial time scales.

Fred.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2002, 08:38
Default Re: CFD-Pro/Engineer
  #9
Jeff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fred,

>>Jeff, are you saying that CFDesign directly discretises the native ProE geometry model?

Yes.

>>Surely there must be some translation into a form that your solver understands?

Hmmm... it's an FEA solver.

IGES and STEP work well for fairly simple geometry, but still require considerable cleanup work for complex surfaces... common knowledge. You are correct that native kernals (Parasolid, Acis) avoid the issues of IGES and STEP. That's why they are included as input options for CFdesign.

MCAD tools are the obvious choice for analysis pre-processing. Today's tools use features and parameters that allow for quick and easy geometry modifications. This provides huge time savings on multiple design iterations... Most real-world design processes are not limited to a single analysis. Engineers need to quickly assess the importance of a variety of design characteristics. It is crucial to avoid the time and effort required by the old MCAD/Export/Pre-processor/Solver one-way process.

Jeff
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 0 February 13, 2002 13:23
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Since Last June John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 3 July 12, 1999 09:38
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33.