- **Main CFD Forum**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/*)

- - **Mac Cormack scheme and use of PML boundary conditi
**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/4275-mac-cormack-scheme-use-pml-boundary-conditi.html*)

Mac Cormack scheme and use of PML boundary conditi
hi i am doing a project aeroacoustic simulation in which i am using Mac Cormack scheme (yes its only 2nd order accurate). i am using linearised euler equations in the primitive form, and forward predictor, backward corrector scheme in 2 Dimensional cartesian grid.and i have a PML domain around my main computaional(from where i get the result). the PML equations i am using r the ones suggested by Mr Fang Q Hu in his paper " on absorbing boundary conditions for linearised euler equations by a perfectly matched layer", in which he splits all the veriables in the main domain(4 variables) into 2 in the pml doamin(thus 8 variables) and adds viscocity terms to the equations. at the PML and main region, i am intrpolating the equations
Now the problem i am facing is that after few (800-900)iterations at the boundary of the main computaional domain on one side the values dip and on the other side they rise... i will like to know if it is because of the reason that i am using such a scheme insteat of some central difference scheme. or there is some other problem. thanx in advance. vineet |

Re: Mac Cormack scheme and use of PML boundary con
Dear Vineet,
In Hu's paper, a filter process is necessary, where a forth-order central difference scheme was used. MacCormack scheme is 2-order and dispersive in nature therefore an effective filter is also needed. In addition, you may try the staggered grid to suppress the spurious oscillations. Hope it's helpful Paul |

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55. |