CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Chebyshev collocation method

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 13, 2002, 23:25
Default Chebyshev collocation method
Sun Yuhui
Posts: n/a
Dear all,

I would like to use Chebyshev collocation method to compute the derivative of function sin(x). Collocation point is taken the form of Gauss-Lobatto. When the number of grid points is small. For example, 50, 100, 200and 300 on interval [0, 2*pi], the accuracy is very high. But with the grid number increasing, the accuracy is lower. Does anybody has experience with Chebyshev collocation method? Could you help me?

Thanks very much!
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2002, 11:47
Default Re: Chebyshev collocation method
Patrick Hanley, Ph.D.
Posts: n/a

When then grid number gets too high, machine error dominates the results. You might want to perform the computations in a higher precision. You might also want to consider dividing the domain into multiple sub-domains to capture features of interest. Why do you need to have more that 200 points for the derivative of sin? I assume that you eventually wish to model a more complex problem.

Much success.

Regards, Patrick Hanley,Ph.D. Aerodynamics Software for the PC.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2002, 04:01
Default Re: Chebyshev collocation method
Posts: n/a
Chebyshev polynomial is defined on interval [-1,1]. Problems on other finite intervals may be mapped onto the standard interval. Mapping is often useful in improving the accuracy of a Chebyshev expansion. If number of grid pionts is very large, the nodes may be compressed together somewhere. So you should choose an appropriate mapping which clusters points as desired.

Good luck!
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2012, 02:46
Red face Chebyshev Collocation method
New Member
Tanmoy Chatterjee
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
tanmoy_dfc is on a distinguished road
I face a problem. How can we solve a coupled differential eigen value problem with chebyshev collocation method,without using the conventional gauss-lobatto quadrature points, and use of differentiation matrices.

I have a paper where they used chebyshev expansion of the variable uptil N+N' where N is the truncation parameter of the series and N' is the the number of boundary conditions incorporated.It will be nice,if i can get through this problem,which i am stuck up to for a week or so...

i have incorporated the pages, for you to refer...

thanks in advance .
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pic1.jpg (40.0 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg pic2.jpg (57.3 KB, 10 views)
tanmoy_dfc is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
discretizer - gmshToFoam Andyjoe Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 13 March 14, 2012 05:35
Code for most powerfull FDV Method D.S.Nasan Main CFD Forum 6 September 4, 2008 02:08
Help about the preconditioner in gmres method Dan Gao Main CFD Forum 3 July 5, 2008 01:18
Poisson eq. with Chebyshev collocation Paul Main CFD Forum 2 March 7, 2002 03:24
Collocation method for similar boundary layer eqs. Stefan Main CFD Forum 1 February 15, 2002 10:18

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:33.