# RANS in Turbomachinery

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 18, 2002, 08:05 RANS in Turbomachinery #1 Gorka Guest   Posts: n/a Dear collegues I would need your opinion about this issue. The restriction of Reynolds averaging in transient flows is that the period of the average ( = the time step of the simulation??) must be much longer than the maximum period of the velocity fluctuations and much shorter than the mean flow variation with time. In turbomachinery,however, the time step must be very short, often shorter than the expected maximum period of the velocity fluctuations. Then, is it inappropiate to use RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) equations in turbomachinery transient problems? and, what about the phase averaging in transient periodic flows? thank you

 January 28, 2002, 09:47 Re: RANS in Turbomachinery #2 wang Guest   Posts: n/a I don't know what you mean here the "maximum periode of the velocity fluctuation". It should be that the time step that you choose must be much more greater that the periode of the turbulence when you want to use RANS equations. When this can not be fulfilled, you should find other ways to solve it.

 January 31, 2002, 14:47 Re: RANS in Turbomachinery #3 Gorka Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you Wang, what I meant with "velocity fluctuations" was "velocity fluctuations due to the turbulence" or "turbulent velocity fluctuations", as you prefer. Anyway, the fact is that using RANS in transient calculation of a turbomachine, i.e. a pump, quite accurate values of it's head gain and performance are often obtained, even with a time step as small as 1e-3 sec. Isn't it surprising?

 February 1, 2002, 06:46 Re: RANS in Turbomachinery #4 wang Guest   Posts: n/a One point is the time scale of turbulence. RANS assumes that the frequency of turbulence fluctuation can be averaged. The most important, i think, would be a characteristic time step, e.g. the time that the flow passes the airfoil. It would be practical when there are several hundreds of steps in such a time, The other point is, you got "accurate" values. It depends on your case, which turbulence model you have used, with or without separation, and many other issues. In fact, turbulence model is such a delicate thing that we must pay more attention to.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post siw Main CFD Forum 0 August 17, 2010 03:18 thecfduser FLUENT 0 November 16, 2009 18:08 hani OpenFOAM 0 March 21, 2008 03:33 christian OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 April 13, 2007 05:31 Nick Georgiadis Main CFD Forum 16 September 1, 1999 16:43

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09.