|
[Sponsors] |
January 22, 2002, 17:00 |
PML approximation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi,
When we apply PML boundary there a a different set of equations along the PML and the main computational domain (and also different variables). Can any one please suggest to me how should i approximate the values required for the computations of these different variables and equations, along the PML main domain interaction. eg . if i am calculating at i'th grid point (in the main domain) and (i+1)'th gridpoint is in PML domain then how do i approximate the other variables(in the PML domain) for time marchiing for the grid point i, and vice -versa. the PML equations considered by me are for linearised euler equations and i an using paper by Mr Fang Q Hu " on absorbing boundary conditions for linearised euler equations by a perfectly matched layer" as reference. thanx in advance vineet undergraduate student IIT bombay India |
|
January 25, 2002, 21:43 |
Re: PML approximation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In Fang's paper, he splitted a variable into two variables. eg. u=u1+u2. But all the derivatives with respect to x and y are for the unsplitted variables. You don't need to use the splitted variables in the main domain. If you need the unsplitted variable u in the PML domain, you only need to add u1 and u2 together.
Hope it is helpful to you! |
|
January 27, 2002, 00:59 |
Re: PML approximation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanx, but i did not get ur point that i won't need the splitted variables in the main domain.... i understand that main domain doesnot have the splitted variables, but at the boundary ot the PML and the main domain to apply any kind of numerical scheme, i should require its adjecent values, i want to know what should i do in case of such a case, i have done the same as you mentioned when i required "u" in the PML domain, i just added the "u1" and "u2" but whaat should i do if i waht the reverse....
awaiting reply. thanx vineet |
|
January 27, 2002, 02:54 |
Re: PML approximation
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think you may solve the eight splitted equations with the absorbing coefficients \sigma equal to 0 in the main domain.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
InterFoam with boussinesq approximation | sinusmontis | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | October 25, 2020 12:21 |
finite difference approximation | Mucx | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 26, 2011 07:46 |
Question on boussinesq approximation | panos_metal | FLUENT | 1 | January 11, 2010 11:18 |
Mac Cormack scheme and use of PML boundary conditi | vineet kshirsagar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 13, 2002 01:46 |
Boussinesq approximation again | Gabriel | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 11, 2000 09:24 |