CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Oscillation at the boundary

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 7, 1999, 09:10
Default Oscillation at the boundary
  #1
arief
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I use MacCormack+FCT to solve the conservation law equations. My problem is I got an oscillation at the boundary. I suspect this is caused by the FCT algorithm can not be fully implemented at the boundaries (FCT needs some grids which are beyond the boundaries). Has someone any idea to solve this problem ?

Thanks in advance,

arief
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 1999, 08:32
Default Re: Oscillation at the boundary
  #2
Thanasis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I gave solution to such problem. I used the MacCormack-Explicit and an Implicit Scheme, which comes from the Lerat family to solve two dimensional Subcritical and Supercritical, open-channel flows. Maybe I could help you if you gave me more information about your problem. What type of problems are you trying to simulate, what is "FCT"? Have you added some artificial viscosity to your equations? Are your equations applied on a transformed grid or not?

Mail me if you want to Klonidis@otenet.gr

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 1999, 21:24
Default Re: Oscillation at the boundary
  #3
Dan Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi there,

I see you still haven't figured your problem out arief.

Since I (and many others) have done a plethora of computations with it, and it works fine, it must be an implementation problem. I have also implemented a MacCormack+FCT code as well and I've seen no problems at boundaries, as you mention. What sort of calculations were you doing again??

You could try the free LCPFCT routines, these ones definitely work.

By "needing grids beyond the boundaries", I assume you mean you're using ghost cells to set the boundary conditions. It is common to do this for many schemes, not only FCT, so you must have an implementation problem.

Dan W.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 1999, 07:45
Default Re: Oscillation at the boundary
  #4
Thanasis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I finally found what FCT is. It's a good way of damping your physical quantities of your problem. As I mentioned in previous report, I used the Mac Cormack explicit technique but with different smoothing and it worked. Lately I've used the Beam & Warming Implicit, which introduces second order differences, and it also worked. So I definitely agree with Mr. Williams. It seems to be an implementation problem. I also point out that not all the damping techniques do they work perfectly. I think that you should pay attention to the way you handle the solid boundaries. Of course the method of ghost cells, which is classical, works in many problems. As far as I am concerned, I didn't use it because it didn't work very well in problems with compound geometry. But tell as about the problems you are trying to solve.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 1999, 08:51
Default Re: Oscillation at the boundary
  #5
arief
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you for your responds,

I am now working on simulation of fuel injection systems. my case occurs for the internal flow in the fuel pipe line.

Like I said, FCT works very well to eliminate the oscillations but only in the internal grids. If shocks reach the boundaries oscillations come out again.

I have tried to use the ghost cells and it doesn't produce a satisfactory results. Perhaps you're right, this is an implementation problems, i will try to find the errors.

Thanks,

arief
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
inlet velocity boundary condition murali CFX 5 August 3, 2012 08:56
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05
CFX doesn't continue calculation... mactech001 CFX 6 November 15, 2009 22:25
Boundary conditions? Tom Main CFD Forum 0 November 5, 2002 02:54
Boundary Conditions Jan Ramboer Main CFD Forum 11 August 16, 1999 08:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:22.