# Grid independence with k-eps model

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 21, 2002, 06:18 Grid independence with k-eps model #1 Mark Render Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, has someone made experiences with the study on grid independence using the standard k-eps model ? I got the impression that is it not easy to converge to a grid independent solution (e.g. airfoil flow) due to the use of wall functions. Could some shed some light on that problem ? Regards, Mark

 February 21, 2002, 08:16 Re: Grid independence with k-eps model #2 Thomas P. Abraham Guest   Posts: n/a Hello Mark, Yes. It's not possible to get grid independent solutions using wall functions. y+ is a function of the mesh, which prevents from getting mesh independent solutions. Thanks, Thomas

 February 21, 2002, 08:33 Re: Grid independence with k-eps model #3 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a If you keep your first node on the same y+ distance all the time you should be able to get grid independence. You can of course not refine your grid so that y+ becomes too low - then the wall-function formulation becomes invalid.

 February 21, 2002, 10:54 Re: Grid independence with k-eps model #4 andy Guest   Posts: n/a This is not quite right. In order to get grid independent solutions using wall functions you must integrate all equations exactly from the point you are holding at y+ = 30 (say) down to the wall. The gradients at the near wall cell are usually large and, for example, the transverse velocity components are usually integrated in the continuity equation by assuming they are constant in the direction normal to the wall. Claims of "grid independence" in a numerical sense are quite unjustified under these circumstances. A parametric change of methods of integration within the near wall cell can lead to changes of wall shear stress of several percent but it is not a trivial task to perform. It also doesn't tell you a great deal at the end. Parametric changes to the wall function numerics combined with grid resolution changes are easier to perform and probably more informative. For fully developed profiles, again, one would typically see differences of around 3-5% or so in wall shear stress (1% the best and 9% the worst in the table I just looked at). Of course, there is no best approach except for limited conditions but it does help estimate the error band when using wall functions particularly unknown ones in commercial codes.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32 wei_wu OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 June 23, 2009 16:53 student Main CFD Forum 6 May 13, 2007 12:25 dibya FLUENT 2 April 27, 2007 09:16 David FLUENT 4 June 8, 2005 16:20

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39.