CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 15, 1998, 23:55
Default Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows
  #1
Hansong Tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Maybe you are a specialist in two-phase problems and know which model, two-fluid model and mixture model, is better for bubbly flows. It seems that many people use two-fluid models, especially for engineering problems. But this kind of models has drawbacks, e.g., it needs two sets of governing equations, one for gas and the other for water, and thus is too complicated. On the other hand, mixture models seem to be less complicated, but I have not found some papers about their turbulence models. If you know something about this, please let me know. Thanks a lot.



  Reply With Quote

Old   July 16, 1998, 13:39
Default Re: Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows
  #2
Pat Diao
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It depends on what you are looking for with the model. Two-fluid model can keep track of the movement and heat/mass transfer within each phase and also be able to calculate the velocity and heat/mass movement on the phase interface, the later of which is sometimes very important, or the focus of the study. The mixture model is simpler but does not give you the interface situation. Often, a seperate local formulations can be used (coupled with or based on the result from the mixture model) to get some limited prediction of the local parameters. Again, it all depends what you are looking for.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 1998, 20:49
Default Re: Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows
  #3
hansong Tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, I agree with; a mixture model cannot describe interface phenomena in details. Actually the difficulty for a good understanding of a two-phase flow araises from the phenomena. However, currently we are interested only in concentration of gas in water, and the mixture model seems to be nice. What I feel to be not sound for this choice is that no proper turbulence model is available.

Sir, do you know some work about the turbulence model? By the way, can you tell me some good references about the separate local formulations you mentioned? Thanks.


  Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 1998, 19:35
Default Re: Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows
  #4
Andrzej Matuszkiewicz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am not sure what you mean by mixture model. If it means the homogeneous mixture model (i.e. no slip, phases well mixed, etc.) I think that it does not make a lot of sense to look for a special two-phase flow turbulence model. You can just use a single-phase model with apparant density, average velocity, etc. equivalent to that of two-phase mixture.

Are you interested in average concentration or may be you want to know concentration profile. In the later case I would suggest using a two-fluid model.

You may want to check the following authors: Serizawa, Bataille, Lopez de Bertodano in any scientifc database (e.g. Compendex). If you screen through some issues of the International Jounal of Multiphase Flow you may find out interesting articles.

Andrzej Matuszkiewicz
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 1998, 21:57
Default Re: Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows
  #5
Hansong Tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Andrzej,

What I mean by a mixture model is often refereed as to a pseudo-fluid model, which considers a bubbly flow as one pseudo-fluid by introducing a pseudo-density that varies between gas and water density extremes. One example of such model can be found in J. Fluid Mech., v240, p59, by Kubota etc.

For such a model I cannot see the reason to simply apply one-phase turbulence model. At least, in the well known k-epsilon model, the constants are determined by some, althogth simple, experimental data. However, can we also find some experiment results for a mixture model?

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 1998, 22:10
Default Development of a turbulence mo?del for pseudo-fluids
  #6
Hansong Tang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As I mentioned in the last message, a main problem to apply a pseudo-fluid method for practical problems is to develop a proper turbulence model.

Any person has idea about such development?

Thanks.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2009, 04:21
Default
  #7
New Member
 
arif
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
arif940 is on a distinguished road
Hi, as you said, how can I do two liquid flow simulation and find concentration profile for mixture. Both liquid have inlet velocity. Thanks
arif940 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Simple Behavioural Models: Fluid Coupling Chromatix Main CFD Forum 0 February 20, 2010 17:17
multi fluid mixture model issue rystokes CFX 3 August 9, 2009 19:13
Variable Composition Mixture vs. Fluid Pair Abby CFX 0 February 18, 2009 12:00
turbulence models for strongly separated flows peter schaffarczyk Main CFD Forum 3 February 9, 1999 18:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55.