# Reynold stress equation

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 5, 2002, 00:25 Reynold stress equation #1 mukkarumhussain Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, My third question. after putting velocity u as a mean velocity U and fluctuating part u' we get Reynold tensor equation. I think derivative of mean velocity U w.r.t.t. should be equal to zero b/c mean velocity is not changing with time but it is present in reynold tensor equation. Why

 August 5, 2002, 01:46 Re: Reynold stress equation #2 S. S. Mudathir Guest   Posts: n/a That is not true. Consider for example a flow in a converging nozzle. when you go along the nozzle the hole velocity increases due to the contraction in area and you cann't say that the increase is only in the fluctuating component in the velocity. due to this the mean velocity is not conistant and should be a function in the spatial coordinates and time for turbulent flow. by the word "mean" in this situation it is meant that the mean velocity in same spatial coordinates will be be constant with respect to time. The same approach could be extended if you have turbulent flow with heat transfer or phase change....

 August 5, 2002, 04:39 Re: Reynold stress equation #3 mukkarumhussain Guest   Posts: n/a In nozzel also mean velocity w.r.t.t. is constant. i agree with you that in nozzle velocity increase due to the reduction in area but this change is not due to time but due to changing in x,y,z, coordinates. In nozzels at a certain point velocity doesn't change with time it remains constant. and if mean velocity changes then what is the meaning of mean velocity b/c i think mean velocity means a constant velocity across which velocity is fluctuating.waiting for your answer.

 August 5, 2002, 08:31 Re: Reynold stress equation #4 S. S. Mudathir Guest   Posts: n/a It depends on what kind of problems you are trying to handle. I mean that when a low or a mathematical relation is driven it is put in it is general form. And when this assumption was made (the mean velocity and fluctuation one) it is not made for only steady flow, it could be used for flows which vary with time. Although you didn't mention whether you are trying to solve steady or unsteady problem butI understand now from your last message that you are handling a steady problem. If I didn't misunderstand you then you are right and the mean velocity doesn't vary with time and then the equation will be reduced to cover the variations with the spatial coordinates. will be pleased to hear your comment and I extremly welcome and cooperation between us. It looks like you are arabic, am I correct?

 August 5, 2002, 23:56 Re: Reynold stress equation #5 mukkarumhussain Guest   Posts: n/a No, I am handling a unsteady flow, I am new in CFD that is why i am trying to get initial knowledge.I am a Research Assistant in NED University(Pakistan) My research project is revemping of Francis Turbine. We are purchasing Fluent software. I think all turbulent flows are unsteady ,am i right. and do you know some website from where i could download materials on Hydraulic or Francis Turbine. From which country you belong and what are you doing.

 August 6, 2002, 03:37 Re: Reynold stress equation #7 Lionel Larcheveque Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I think the problem is related to the definition of the average you use: Formally, Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations are related to an ensemble average (you perform measurements on several runs of the same experimental configuration and you average the measurements). The mean quantities can therefore be time dependent. If you want to use time averaging, you have to invoke ergodicity. It postulates that time average and ensemble average are equivalent. But one of the hypothesis needed to use this relation is that the measurements should be statistically stationary. Hope this help.

 August 6, 2002, 23:47 Re: Reynold stress equation #8 mukkarumhussain Guest   Posts: n/a In your example of Francis Turbine flow is steady but velocity is changing in every point with time as i think, and if velocity is also not changing then flow would be laminar not turbulent.am i right.

 August 6, 2002, 23:50 Re: Reynold stress equation #9 mukkarumhussain Guest   Posts: n/a Thanx for your kind help. Can you tell me what is the critaria to take characteristic length nd characteristic velocity.

 August 7, 2002, 03:18 Re: Reynold stress equation #10 S. S. Mudathir Guest   Posts: n/a if you mean u` (the randomely varying component---> yes you are rigth, i you mean U (the mean velocity) no you are wrong.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mihail CFX 7 September 7, 2014 06:27 Feng Main CFD Forum 0 November 3, 2009 22:10 daniel sin FLUENT 0 July 30, 2006 20:20 sagga FLUENT 0 August 16, 2004 03:19 Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 4 November 15, 2000 07:01

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top