CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

ratio grid resolution (near wall/center) of dispersed bubbly flow columns using LES

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 29, 1999, 08:18
Default ratio grid resolution (near wall/center) of dispersed bubbly flow columns using LES
  #1
Ridwan Setiadi Arrizar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi there,

I have some questions regarding grid resolution near the column wall (assuming large columns) in dispersed bubbly flow. I assume in order to simulate boundary layer effects the meshsize here should be smaller then at the center (For simplicity the grid is not addaptively refined here). I made this assumption since in the flow simulation around (for example) a wing section the grid-density is higher near the surface of the wing (Boundary layer eq.) in order to reduce CPU time the far field is solved with different equations and the fields are then matched. In the bubble column the usage of different eq. is/can not be done, in order to simulate the turbulence inducing effect of bubbles interacting with the carier fluid.

question 1:

What should be the (functional) ratio of the meshsizes also related with LES-modelling?

question 2:

is this commonly done in process eng. (please put some references)? Since I still haven not found papers where researchers did this.

reactions (especially from related field) are encouraged!

Thank you.

Ridwan.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 30, 1999, 18:43
Default Re: ratio grid resolution (near wall/center) of dispersed bubbly flow columns using LES
  #2
Mayank Tyagi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Ridwan..

I'm answering the question 1 posed by you; how to get a filter size for LES model from non-uniform mesh ?(i'm changing the form of question ... but i hope this is what you meant) A. Scotti (in his dissertation at johns' hopkins) has shown that grid aspect ratio has a significant effect on the anisotropic grids and the coefficient for models calculated by dynamic procedure should take care of this factor.

Ghosal and Moin ( CTR research briefs) mentioned about the problem of commutative errors using a filter which is function of position ...(in your case it will be !!)

Vasiliyev and Lund (CTR research briefs) formulated a general class of commutative filters ...( the problem with this formulation is that filters thus constructed are not realizable ...)

I would suggest you to have a look at the above mentioned works, it will give a better insight about filtering as well as choosing the filter size from the anisotropic grid.

mayank
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grid stretching ratio for different flow regions quarkz Main CFD Forum 3 May 22, 2006 04:38
LES on two phase flow Li Yang Main CFD Forum 0 May 12, 2004 08:10
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 13:19
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31
Grid Independent Solution Chuck Leakeas Main CFD Forum 2 May 26, 2000 11:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04.