CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Please help me to simulate a river using CFD-ACE+

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 27, 2002, 20:51
Default Please help me to simulate a river using CFD-ACE+
  #1
Sas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Is there anyone who knows how to simulate a river with CFD-ACE+?

I am trying to use CFD-ACE+ to simulate a river flow. I scaled down the model by a factor of 0.01. I have checked the grid and no bad cell has been reported. All the aspect ratios are under 5.0. The number of the cells is 19890. I cannot make it smaller because it will cause a big difference between some cells. The river is open and its width varies, depend on the water elevation. Thus, basically I only make the river bed (as real as possible using field data) and make a big domain on top of it. Then, I set the volume conditon as having two fluids, air and water. Water flows through the inlet.

I set the simulation as: Problem: Flow and Free Surfaces Gravity: -9.81m/s2 Auto Time Step Ref. Density: Automatic Surf. Reconst: 2nd Order (PLIC) Surface Tension: No Marangani Fluids: air and water Inlet: Fix. Vel (Normal): 0.1 m/s

My questions are: 1. What is the best way to simulate a river with CFD-ACE? Do you have any example? (I could not find any from the Internet! Except one about Niagara fall from Canada CFD-ACE website) 2. How can I make the solution faster? The solver did not converge when I used 'Standard' Transient Time Step. (2000 Time step with 0.01 s/step.) 'Automatic' Transient Time Step sounds better. But the Time Steps are very small so that the calculation takes very long. 3. What is the best way to VIEW the result? Should I use RHO or LiqVOF? In both ways, the water density looks strange. It becomes smaller, from 1 to 0.5 (even less). I do not think it is true. 4. Can I use 'mass-flow rate', instead of velocity? What does kg/s mean in 'mass-flow rate'. If I have a 500m2 of a river's section and the water velocity is 2m/s, then the 'mass-flow rate' is 1000000kg/s. (1000m3x1000kg/s). Am I right? 5. Which is better: to set the initial volume for all fluid1 or for fluid2? 6. Why cannot I use 'turbulent' facility for free surface?

Best regards,

Dr Prasasto Satwiko Faculty of Engineering University of Atma Jaya Yogyakarta Jl Babarsari 44 Yogyakarta 55281 INDONESIA

fax. 62 274 487748 e-mail: psat@indosat.net.id
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD to simulate the blood flow in a capillary tube Tim Main CFD Forum 11 September 26, 2005 19:56
Can we use CFD to simulate a refrigerant system Xio Wang Main CFD Forum 0 March 15, 2003 01:31
ASME CFD Symposium - Call for Papers Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 September 25, 2001 10:17
What is the Better Way to Do CFD? John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 54 April 23, 2001 08:10
public CFD Code development Heinz Wilkening Main CFD Forum 38 March 5, 1999 12:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:47.