CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Structured or un-structured solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 5, 2002, 12:56
Default Structured or un-structured solver
Jérémy D
Posts: n/a
hye all,

i hope someone will be able to help me.

I would like to understand the difference between structured and un-structured meshing. What are the main differences of the 2 methods ? What are the pro & the cons of each method ? Are physics models the same ? Is there any sector which uses more a model than another (aerospace, turbomachinery, automotive...) In the future, which model will win ?

Thanks for your help

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2002, 13:33
Default Re: Structured or un-structured solver
Posts: n/a
The fundamental difference lies in how the adjacency of neighboring cells and nodes are provided.

In a structured grid, the cell or node adjacency is implied from the ordering of the nodes. The grid definition is given in terms of a network of points with distinct i,j,k planes, like a 3-D block. There is no need to store cell connectivity definitions. Every node (i,j,k) in a structured grid has a fixed number of neighbors (6), and those neighbors are always identified as i+1, i-1, j+1, j-1, k+1, k-1. Generating grids for complicated geometries can be more difficult or time consuming using structured grids, but it is easier to construct higher order schemes versus the unstructured approach.

In an unstructured grid, cell and node adjacency is completely arbitrary. A given node j may have any arbitrary number of neighboring nodes, and these neighboring node numbers cannot be implied from the node order. Rather the neighbors must be explicitly provided by providing the cell connectivities. The key advantage here lies in the relative ease of using arbitrary meshes of tetrahedra, pyramids, prisms, and/or hexahedra, allowing for flexible, rapid grid generation compared with block structured grids. Key disadvantage being these methods are inherently more memory intensive owing to the need to store the cell definitions.

Which is "better" depends largely on who you talk to.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets sankarv OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 17 December 3, 2014 20:41
[ICEM] Unstructure Meshing Around Imported Plot3D Structured Mesh ICEM kawamatt2 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 17 December 20, 2011 12:45
Working directory via command line Luiz CFX 4 March 6, 2011 21:02
Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets sankarv OpenFOAM 0 April 4, 2010 18:06
Symmetry plane error in solver Santiago Orrego. CFX 6 January 31, 2007 08:09

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03.