|
[Sponsors] |
December 19, 2002, 15:58 |
CFD vs. traditional methods?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
I am writing an architecture dissertation just now and a small part of it briefly covers CFD. I have read that CFD was used to study air flow in a potential fire in a building.. Is this possible using traditional mathematical methods or limited to computer simulation? Are there architecture related aspects that can be analysed with only CFD - and not with a physical model?... I appreciated any responses. Thanks Mike |
|
December 19, 2002, 16:15 |
Re: CFD vs. traditional methods?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I did a google search using "sofie cfd" and got many hits.
SOFIE = simulation of fires in enclosures. One of the better ones seems to be at http://fseg.gre.ac.uk/fire/fire_modelling_standards/ |
|
December 19, 2002, 16:19 |
Re: CFD vs. traditional methods?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the prompt reply.. I am checking out that page right now.
Mike |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difference CFD, Panel methods & Vortex lattice? | mimi | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 7, 2006 09:51 |
CFD Wiki - We Need More Help | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 13 | September 13, 2005 17:36 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 13, 2000 04:48 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
knowledge about CFD. | VASANT NAVATI | CFX | 1 | November 28, 1999 00:22 |