# Why SIMPLE family algorithms are not used in LES?

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 18, 2002, 09:24 Why SIMPLE family algorithms are not used in LES? #1 Linfeng BI Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, everyone: Such algorithms as SIMPLE and PISO also has the ability to solve unsteady problems. But why they are not widely used in DNS/LES? Is it only because of their large computational expense? thanks, Linfeng

 November 18, 2002, 21:31 Re: Why SIMPLE family algorithms are not used in L #2 Ulises Guest   Posts: n/a Because they have dissipative character at small scales close to the smallest scales resolved and therefore modify the spectrum of those scales. A scheme is called dissipative when it amplifies or reduces some modes amplitudes. A centered scheme is purely dispersive, does not modify the amplitude of any scale but only its phase. As soon as you use a not purely centered scheme in a purely regular mesh, one introduces small numerical dissipation that can artificially stabilize or unstabilize the computation. In DNS and specially LES one has to be able to solve accurately the amplitude of the modes up to the smallest scales

 November 18, 2002, 23:07 Re: Why SIMPLE family algorithms are not used in L #3 versi Guest   Posts: n/a I guess SIMPLE type algorithms can do DNS and LES on staggered grids where seemly pure central differences can be used for any spatial derivatives. But it seems there is few such work. I do not know why.

 November 18, 2002, 23:18 Re: Why SIMPLE family algorithms are not used in L #4 Ulises Guest   Posts: n/a Oh yeah you're right...sorry I had a terrible memory lapsus... Yes I think SIMPLE algorithm would require too many sub-steps for each time step for unsteady calculations. It is best suited for steady calculations (or calculations in which you seek converged steady solution) and DNS-LES are inherently unsteady...or something like that, hope my memory is not failing again

 November 19, 2002, 11:35 Re: Why SIMPLE family algorithms are not used in L #5 Linfeng BI Guest   Posts: n/a Then it should be the case of computational expense? By the way, I am not sure whether central difference is more difficult to converge than upwind.

 November 19, 2002, 20:05 Re: Why SIMPLE family algorithms are not used in L #6 FUFU Guest   Posts: n/a Sometimes time accuracy is more important than any other parameters. In DNS/LES more than second order time differencing scheme is recommended. And in spacial differencing, upwind families schmes are too dissipative so that cannot resolve small scale chacteres.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Basy OpenFOAM 1 October 16, 2011 03:51 dshawul Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2010 10:56 Geon-Hong Main CFD Forum 2 April 5, 2010 18:05 behzad Main CFD Forum 2 July 4, 2005 03:13 anne Main CFD Forum 7 March 7, 2003 04:39

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:59.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top