|
[Sponsors] |
November 19, 2002, 03:36 |
convergence confirmation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello.
After getting the solution, I am facing a difficulty in judging that the particular set of input turbulence parameters (example; Dissipation length scale & Turbulence intensity in standard K E modal), being selected are correct. For this, should I check the residuals of turbulence only or do I need to check something else. I will appreciate your guidance in this regard IRFAN |
|
November 19, 2002, 05:05 |
Re: convergence confirmation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
(a) there was an application-oriented publication by prof. brian thomas (metallurgical & materials transactions 1990 ? ) - interesting ! (b) one author ('forget !!) had suggested cv-wise integn of k and matching. (c) comparison with experimental results if available (d) when you say "After getting the solution", it is implied you've gone as per your checklist for 'landing' - consistency in formulation, stability, convergence (continuity, mom, k-eps), etc,etc - else it may have a crash landing.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence | Centurion2011 | FLUENT | 48 | June 14, 2022 23:29 |
Force can not converge | colopolo | CFX | 13 | October 4, 2011 22:03 |
Convergence of CFX field in FSI analysis | nasdak | CFX | 2 | June 29, 2009 01:17 |
Defect correction and convergence | ganesh | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 30, 2006 14:20 |
Convergence confirmation | Irfan | FLUENT | 3 | November 24, 2002 00:54 |