CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Kolomogorov length scale

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 21, 2002, 11:16
Default Kolomogorov length scale
  #1
Bobby
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, everyone,

I have a small question in DNS. How can I estimate the necessary grid nodes in a special computation, i.e. the smallest length scale? I think it must be from the Kolomogorov length scale, but how to recon in detais? Thanks for your help.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2002, 09:20
Default Re: Kolomogorov length scale
  #2
student
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hai you have rleation ship betweeen number of nodes and reynolds number with kolmogorv length scale. eta=L/(Re)^3/4. Where L is the box dimension and equal to Ndeltax. where N is the number of nodes in each diemnsionas. I think I answered your question bye student
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2002, 09:50
Default Re: Kolomogorov length scale
  #3
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How many grid points you need in a DNS? There is no straight answer to this question. It depends on the numerical method you are using and the kind of statistics you want to compute. The general rule is that the grid spacing should be three times the Kolmogorov length scale. If you you are only interested in mean and rms values of the velocity the grid spacing can be larger but if you want to compute higher order statistics you need more grid points perhaps. If you want to calculate a homogeneous flow, channel flow or boundary layer flow you can also look into the literature to see what other people are using.

Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2002, 10:37
Default Re: Kolomogorov length scale
  #4
Bobby
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your reply. I do know that the smallest grid scale need not be equal to Kolomorogov scale (some value about 10-15*Kscale is enough in Moin(1998)'s opinion). What I want to know is how to calculate this ruler scale in details? (I do DNS of free jets.) Thank you very much.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2002, 10:44
Default Re: Kolomogorov length scale
  #5
Bobby
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your information. I am wondering if this simple method can be evaluated in all DNS cases. and could you please tell me where this formula come from (the original paper discussing about this)? Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2002, 11:15
Default Re: Kolomogorov length scale
  #6
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In the far field of a round jet the dissipation is self-similar, see the discussion on page 127-128 and the figure on page 130 in the book of Pope, Turbulent flows. Given the diameter of the jet, the initial velocity and viscosity you can then calculate the Kolmogorov length scale as a function of the distance to the orifice. There are also DNS of round jets reported in literature. These can give you an idea what kind of resolution you need.

Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2002, 11:29
Default Re: Kolomogorov length scale
  #7
Bobby
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your help.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2002, 13:25
Default just check..
  #8
Patrick Godon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You can also check after you performed the simulations (de facto) that your scale is correct, rather than checking before (ab initio). Just plot the energy as a function of the wave number k, and make sure that the end of the spectrum has the slope you expect for the Kolmogorov law (depends whether it is 2D or 3D) and that it covers at least one order of magnitude in k. Your artificial viscosity should kill the higher k without damaging the slope and the rest of the spectrum. You want to have enough resolution (grid points) to reach the part of the spectrum that shows nicely the Kolmorov slope, and a (artificial) visosity that reaches only the smallest scale (higher k). So you have to play with the number of grid points and the Reynold number numerically untill you reach these conditions. Depending on the numerical scheme you use and the order of the numerical method, these numbers can vary a lot for a specific flow problem.

Patrick
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2002, 04:54
Default Re: just check..
  #9
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
OK, this works nicely when you have a spectral method or a higher order FDM because then you calculate a good spectrum. But when you use a lower (second) order FDM or FVM I doubt if you can calculate a clear spectrum.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Integral Length Scale vs Turbulent Length Scale Scott Nordsen FLUENT 2 January 20, 2014 02:17
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale rizhang CFX 1 September 10, 2009 06:38
Turbulent Characteristic Length/Turbulent Length Scale fluentnoob FLUENT 2 July 3, 2009 08:40
LES inlet length scale f.neilson Main CFD Forum 0 January 31, 2005 14:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:06.