|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Since a even order central differential scheme has a huge numerical dissipation to the calculation of turbulence boundary layer, it is very difficult to hold the U_tau and turbulent statistical qualities. Structures are decay very fast in my LES simulations, dynamic modeling + LUSGS scheme used on that.
My question is that, Does anyone encounter it before? Do you have some suggestions to the numerical dissipation? |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As far as I know, 2nd order central difference scheme can work fairly well in LES if the desired order of the statistical quantities is not too high ( say 2nd order).
Maybe your mesh is not fine enough, or try employing a wall model in your simulation. regards |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Default Faces on Boundary Layer | axel | Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... | 8 | February 17, 2011 07:47 |
| Adapt mesh without modifying boundary layer cells? | Freeman | FLUENT | 0 | February 22, 2009 14:11 |
| 3D Boundary Layer | Mario | FLUENT | 0 | February 17, 2009 03:40 |
| Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |
| boundary layer thickness | 98.4F | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 29, 2000 07:23 |