CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Boundary Layer Question

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 5, 2003, 10:07
Default Boundary Layer Question
  #1
P. Birken
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is there an estimate of the size of the stress term (especially the laplacian), in terms of the Reynolds-number? Formulated otherwise: how can it be, that Laplace(u)/Re can have an impact on the flow field? Laplace(u) is probably O(Re), but how can I see that?

Sincerely yours,

Philipp
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2003, 16:42
Default Re: Boundary Layer Question
  #2
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's not uniformly O(1/R)everywhere in the domain! If you write Y=y/R^(1/2) in the equations and take the limit R tends to infinity keeping Y=O(1) you obtain the Prandlt Boundary layer equations.

If a solution to these equations exists (and it usually doesn't because of flow separation) then the viscous correction is O(1/R^(1/2)) which is much bigger than your speculated O(1/R).

Now when the boundary layer separates the lack of a solution to the boundary layer equations indicates that the viscous correction is much greater than the above O(R^(-1/2)). For weakly (marginal) separated flow Triple-deck theory actually shows that the viscous correction is O(R^(-3/8)).

Hope his helps,

Tom.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2003, 05:48
Default Re: Boundary Layer Question
  #3
P. Birken
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, that helped, thanks.

I understand that the impact of the viscousity in the boundary layer is significant. My problem is the simulation of fires in car tunnels and I'm thinking whether I have to include the viscous terms or not. The Reynold's number is about 10^6, so the boundary layer is very small. Is the impact noticable in the rest of the tunnel?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2003, 12:33
Default Re: Boundary Layer Question
  #4
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
At a Reynolds number of O(10^6) your calculatation must be using a turbulence model. In which case you can get away with ignoring the "viscous terms". The uncertainty in the turbulence closure and the fire (combustion) model will be far greater in magnitude than the Reynolds number effects,

Tom.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2003, 08:19
Default Re: Boundary Layer Question
  #5
P. Birken
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks, I will probably do that!

Yours,

Philipp
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Very technical question about solving wall boundary layer ... jlb001 FLUENT 6 December 27, 2014 06:56
Domain Imbalance HMR CFX 3 March 6, 2011 21:10
Boundary layer generation problems ivan_cozza OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 October 6, 2010 13:47
question on bounday layer modeling Wen Long Main CFD Forum 2 November 12, 2005 18:29
Please help with flow around car modelling! Tudor Miron CFX 17 March 19, 2004 20:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43.