CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Entropy calculation using CFD

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 6, 2003, 16:12
Default Entropy calculation using CFD
  #1
MJK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello there,

I am looking for a way to calculate sum of entropy rises due to viscous effects, shoks, temp. gradient etc. throughout the computational domain and compare it with entropy difference of outlet and inlet.

I wonder if anyone can help or introduce a reference.

Appreciated

MJK

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2003, 08:45
Default Re: Entropy calculation using CFD
  #2
walter schwarz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
try these links ...

http://www.memagazine.org/backissues...y/entropy.html

http://www.memagazine.org/backissues...py/entgen.html
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2003, 10:46
Default Re: Entropy calculation using CFD
  #3
MJK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Walter,

In fact that was the only source I had found on this matter- of course other than what Bejan has explained in his text.

I wonder if anyone has tried such an approach and been able to match entropy generation due to viscous dissipation and temp gradient WITH the overall entropy rise throughout the domain.

Regards

MJK
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2003, 05:50
Default Re: Entropy calculation using CFD
  #4
Bob Roach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Entropy is a state variable, as such it may be computed from two other state variables (like pressure and temperature). Why can you just not compute it at each of your points in the domain.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 11, 2003, 16:44
Default Re: Entropy calculation using CFD
  #5
Mkermani@unb.ca
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Bob,

That is right- entropy at any point can be obtained in terms of two other independent variables.

I was asking how is it possible to obatin and compare entropy generation within the domain due to (1) viscous effects, (2) thermal effects and (3) shock waves.

Some good explanation is given in text by A Bejan- but it does say no wrod about the shock effect.

Regards

Mohammad
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 12, 2003, 02:33
Default Re: Entropy calculation using CFD
  #6
Bob Roach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Since the CFD solution gives you just the values of the variables (including entropy if you've computed that), it is likely to assess how much a change at any point came from what physics. However, you may be able to get an idea by figuring out where you are in the domain. For instance, if you are near a shock wave, compare the entropy rise with the theoretical. The difference will be the sum of the other physics and the CFD error associated with any nonconxservation of entropy. Away from shock waves, there will be no entropy generation due to that effect. Similarly, within a boundary layer, you may assume the entropy rise is due viscous and thermal effects. To separate out the thermal effects from the viscous, I suppose you could do an inviscid computation for the same conditions (except for using a slip BC on solid surfaces) and check the difference.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD Design...The CFD Future John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 20 November 19, 2015 23:40
ASME CFD Symposium Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2001 06:41
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2000 10:07
PC vs. Workstation Tim Franke Main CFD Forum 5 September 29, 1999 15:01
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:05.